Uhambo Lwabo: A Narrative Study of Black Dramatherapists’ Perspectives on the South African Drama Therapy Field

Abstract

The question of visibility as a representation gap in Drama Therapy underpins this research. Official department records show that approximately 80 percent of the total student cohort between 2014 to 2021 were women and of that percentage less than a third comprised of Black female students. According to Jones (2013), the “drama” part involves theatre, embodiment, and shamanistic qualities of performance, dance, ritual, and metaphor form part of the therapy process. As such, metaphor becomes a language for the exploration and expression of traumas, furthermore its power lies in interpretation for the means of psychoanalysis through psychodrama. Additionally, the practice is informed by classical psychology: the empirical scientific study of human cognition and behaviour. Linking back to metaphor, the research argues that despite the foundational underpinnings of the field, Drama Therapy relies on notions of the person that are still conditional to a universalising and standardized notion of the Human that make the practice of the field alienating. Similarly, Tamale (2020) articulates invisibilising as a present and exploitative by-product of colonialism still active in universities which are founded on coloniality and thus render Black bodies and their intellectual products invisible. Therefore, the research examines how dramatherapy is affected through invisibilisation and as such interrogates its complicity. Consequently, the research takes on an Afro-feminist onto-epistemological response. Five semi-structured interviews were conducted with Black women dramatherapists. Chapter 1 outlines the background of research as an outsider to the dramatherapy field and learning of the discipline from dialogues outsides of the institution thus forming my rationale. Chapter 2 is the literature review which reveals the trend of invisibilising Black students within psychology, dramatherapy foundations and the post-colonial conditions of becoming a dramatherapist. Chapter 3 summarises the methodology of narrative, the analysis method, and the role of being an insider- researcher and reflexivity. Chapter 4 presents the narratives and themes that signal to invisibilisation. Chapter 5 provides Black women dramatherapists perspectives in response and resistance to being invisibilised. Chapter 6 is the conclusion which surmises the composite implications of this research. The research demonstrated an enduring practice of invisibilising Black dramatherapy students through the low annual student intake. Secondly, that invisibilising takes place within the master’s year through teaching material and the role of clinical supervision. Lastly, the invisibilisation of Black dramatherapists extends into the profession within professional representative bodies as well as through department cultures.