Stakeholder Management in the Implementation of Community Arts Centres Policy in South Africa: A Comparative Case Study of Indonsa and Fezile Dabi CACs

dc.contributor.authorSekhabi, Nontutuzelo Consolation
dc.contributor.supervisorChatikobo, Munyaradzi
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-22T07:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionA research report submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Art, in the Faculty of Humanities, Law and Management, Wits School of Arts, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2025
dc.description.abstractThis study critically examined the implementation of Community Arts Centres (CACs) policy in South Africa, with a specific focus on stakeholder management. Despite being envisioned as vehicles for cultural participation, community development, and social cohesion, many CACs have struggled to fulfil their mandate due to fragmented governance, poor coordination among stakeholders, and unclear policy translation. Using a qualitative, comparative case study approach, the research focused on two CACs—Indonsa in KwaZulu-Natal and Fezile Dabi in the Free State—selected for their contrasting contexts and administrative arrangements. Primary data were collected through 21 semi-structured interviews with government officials, CAC managers, staff, users, and community members, supplemented by field observations and document analysis. The study revealed that ineffective intergovernmental relations, limited policy literacy, under-resourced infrastructure, and weak participatory mechanisms hinder policy implementation. Furthermore, the research highlighted the lack of a coherent stakeholder engagement framework and the absence of institutional support for leadership and programme development. Drawing on stakeholder theory and intergovernmental relations literature, the study concluded that meaningful policy implementation in CACs depends on collaborative governance, clearly defined roles, transparent communication, and community participation. Key recommendations include the development of a national stakeholder management framework, institutionalisation of local advisory forums, capacity-building for CAC leadership, and the alignment of national policy with on-the-ground realities. The study offers insights relevant to policymakers, practitioners, and cultural stakeholders seeking to revitalise CACs as vibrant community assets.
dc.description.submitterMM2026
dc.facultyFaculty of Humanities
dc.identifier.citationSekhabi, Nontutuzelo Consolation . (2025). Stakeholder Management in the Implementation of Community Arts Centres Policy in South Africa: A Comparative Case Study of Indonsa and Fezile Dabi CACs [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/49492
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/49492
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2025 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolWits School of Arts
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectStakeholders Management
dc.subjectCommunity Arts Centres
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.subjectPolicy Implementation
dc.subjectCoordination
dc.subjectPartnerships
dc.subject.primarysdgSDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
dc.titleStakeholder Management in the Implementation of Community Arts Centres Policy in South Africa: A Comparative Case Study of Indonsa and Fezile Dabi CACs
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sekhabi_Stakeholder _2025.pdf
Size:
514.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: