A comparative study of how four selected newspapers framed the coverage of the death of mthokozisi ntumba
dc.contributor.author | MAGOMANI, AMUKELANI | |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Balliah, Dinesh | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-13T10:32:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-13T10:32:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description | A research report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts degree in Journalism and Media Studies to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, School of Accountancy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023 | |
dc.description.abstract | For years, traditional media such as newspapers have played a pivotal role in circulating news and information for public consumption. South Africa has recently experienced an increase in news on police brutality cases against protesters on various platforms covered by the newspapers. This study analyses the framing of media coverage by Daily Maverick, Daily Sun, Mail & Guardian, and Sowetan newspapers of the pre-and post-trial of the law enforcement officers charged with the killing of Mthokozisi Ntumba. This case was centred on forceful actions by police officials to disperse a crowd during a student protest. Although Ntumba was not amongst the protesting crowds, he was shot and killed by police officers. The study aims to discover the ways in which Ntumba’s case was reported by the four selected newspapers. The nature, aim, objectives and contextual significance of this study dictates that a qualitative research approach be used. The study was underpinned by the framing theory. Qualitative data was collected using the content analysis method, with purposive sampling used to select all textual units that contributed towards answering the study’s research questions. A sample of 83 articles was selected on the basis that the articles reported the news of the killing of Ntumba and the follow up court trial of the police officers. Qualitative framing analysis was used to study the media coverage of the killing of a bystander and police brutality in South Africa. From the study’s findings, it was revealed that different frames were used by the four selected newspapers in the coverage of Ntumba’s case. The frames used by the selected newspapers highlighted the extent to which the issue of police brutalityin the country has led to the death of people and other underlying issues that exist due to police brutality during protests. | |
dc.description.submitter | GM2024 | |
dc.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | |
dc.identifier | https://orcid.org/ 0009-0007-4354-3717 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Magomani, Amukelani. (2023). A comparative study of how four selected newspapers framed the coverage of the death of mthokozisi ntumba [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10539/42421 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
dc.rights | © 2024 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. | |
dc.rights.holder | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
dc.school | School of Literature, Language and Media | |
dc.subject | Framing, Media Reports, Newspapers, Police Brutalit | |
dc.subject.other | SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | |
dc.title | A comparative study of how four selected newspapers framed the coverage of the death of mthokozisi ntumba | |
dc.type | Dissertation |