A Survey of Caudal Anaesthesia practice in an academic anaesthesia unit

dc.contributor.authorJulius, Sepheu Letshokge
dc.contributor.supervisorMamoojee, Anisah
dc.contributor.supervisorMogane, Palesa
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-12T10:19:35Z
dc.date.available2024-11-12T10:19:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionA research report submitted in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medicine in the branch of Anaesthesiology to the Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2022
dc.description.abstractBackground Caudal blockade is a means of providing intra and postoperative analgesia and minimises the sympathetic stress response to abdominal and lower limb surgery. Clear anatomical landmarks and ease of performing the procedure make it one of the most commonly performed regional techniques in the paediatric population. Methods A prospective, contextual, descriptive study was conducted between 2020 and 2021 on anaesthetists working in an academic anaesthesia unit. Data was collected anonymously through a digital questionnaire and participation was voluntary. Results The study sample is made up of 40 consultants and career medical officers (27%), 87 registrars (61%), 15 medical officers (10.6%) and two community service medical officers (1.4%). Plain bupivacaine at 2.5mg/kg was found to be the local anaesthetic of choice. Most participants,90 (63.1%), did not use an adjunct in their caudal blocks, with the risk of excessive sedation and risk of postoperative apnoea being the most frequently cited reasons. Where an adjunct was used, the alpha-2 agonists; clonidine (64.5%) and dexmedetomidine (53.2%) were chosen. The majority,122 (85.1%), anaesthetists acquired consent specifically for caudal blocks. Potential complications of caudal blockade, the duration of analgesia and the technique of the caudal block were frequently discussed with patients and their caregivers when obtaining consent. Use of ultrasound is not in widespread practice, and block failure was reported by 91 (63.8%) participants. Paracetamol was the most regularly employed rescue analgesia. Conclusion This study found that the academic unit’s caudal blockade practice compared well with local and international literature. The use of adjuncts, ultrasound and caudal catheters is not a widespread practice, and clear guidelines may be beneficial in this regard. Use of standardised informed consent protocols may improve the patient and caregiver experience
dc.description.submitterMM2024
dc.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
dc.identifier.citationJulius, Sepheu Letshokge. (2024). A Survey of Caudal Anaesthesia practice in an academic anaesthesia unit [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WireDSpace.https://hdl.handle.net/10539/42372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/42372
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2022 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolSchool of Clinical Medicine
dc.subjectpaediatric
dc.subjectAnaesthetic practise
dc.subjectAnalgesia
dc.subjectCaudal block
dc.subject.otherSDG-3: Good health and well-being
dc.titleA Survey of Caudal Anaesthesia practice in an academic anaesthesia unit
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Julius_Survey_2024.pdf
Size:
901.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: