What is called literature? Heidegger, responsive figuration, and the aspect of be-ing

dc.contributor.authorVan Niekerk, Marthinus Christoffel
dc.contributor.supervisorWilliams, Merle
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-16T13:19:33Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionA research report Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for a Doctor of Philosophy, In the Faculty of Humanities , School of Literature, Language and Media, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2024
dc.description.abstractFrom the metaphysical orientation of Western thinking, being is understood as presence, truth as correspondence, and language as representation. This understanding inclines reflections on the nature of literature towards the question “What is literature?”, and calls for responses that seek determinative commonalities between literary objects. In this thesis, I attempt a different approach to the being of literature, prompted by Heidegger’s thinking, which understands being dynamically and non-substantively as the self-withholding clearing which grants beings their appearance. Language does not unfold primarily in meaningful references between objects, but in dis-closure; it responds to the aspect of be-ing, showing beings in their being by showing the possibility of meaninglessness in every appearance. This is what clears and holds open a reach for referential play. Language therefore entails a response to the self-withholding of being, and in that sense itself speaks. In this light, “What is called literature?” becomes a question concerning how being calls on language to respond as literature, and human beings are called on to participate responsively in this dialogue. Two different but interconnected ways in which literature calls are investigated. On the one hand, literature promises a reach of discursive representability; it demands the disclosure of beings as orderable and immediately available. On the other hand, literature figures a rift, a drawing in the sense both of a meaningfully gathered marking, and of a drawing open which draws away. I read William Blake’s The First Book of Urizen to trace how it literalizes the tension between these callings of literature. It figures a rift, and puts into play a differencing relation between a poetic attunement to delay and non-arrival, and the demand for arrival arising from its positioning within the realm of discursive availability which characterizes the contemporary field of literature.
dc.description.submitterMM2025
dc.facultyFaculty of Humanities
dc.identifier0009-0003-1545-4697
dc.identifier.citationVan Niekerk, Marthinus Christoffel. (2024). What is called literature? Heidegger, responsive figuration, and the aspect of be-ing [Masters dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/44812
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2024 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolSchool of Literature, Language and Media
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectMartin Heidegger
dc.subjectWilliam Blake
dc.subjectThe First Book of Urizen
dc.subjectfiguration
dc.subjectliterature
dc.subjectresponsiveness
dc.subject.primarysdgSDG-4: Quality education
dc.titleWhat is called literature? Heidegger, responsive figuration, and the aspect of be-ing
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
van Niekerk_What_2024.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: