Analysis of Orthopaedic Injuries in Polytrauma Patients at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital

Abstract

Background: Traumatic injuries represent a significant burden globally, accounting for ten percent of the global burden of disease. In South Africa we commonly see patients who have sustained major trauma, often with multiple injuries. This significant burden of trauma necessitates the demand for rapid diagnostic assessment of injuries for appropriate therapeutic intervention. A whole body computed tomography (CT pan scan) allows for a rapid multisystem injury diagnosis of trauma patients. There is a scarcity of literature evaluating the extent of orthopaedic injuries in polytrauma patients. Study Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the local epidemiology of orthopaedic injuries in polytrauma patients who have undergone a CT pan scan. Methods: A retrospective, observational analysis, based at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, was done of polytrauma patients who underwent a CT pan scan, during a 2-year period from 01/01/2018 – 31/12/2019. A database was compiled by accessing the picture archiving and communication system for CT reports. The qualitative data was reported using frequencies and percentages. Categorical variables were analysed using the Chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test). Results: Over the two-year study period a total of 296 polytrauma patients had a reported CT pan scan performed. Of these, 85% were male and 15% were female with a median age of 33 years. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accidents (33.1%). The prevalence of orthopaedic injuries in polytrauma patients was 53.3%. A total of 1012 injuries were found. One hundred and ninety-six (196) spinal fractures were detected; a total of 137 pelvic/sacral fractures, 101 long bone fractures with 75% lower limbs and 25% were upper limb fractures. The most common non-orthopaedic injury sustained was a chest injury. The most common combination of orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic injuries identified in the study was a chest injury with an associated pelvic/sacral fracture secondary to a PVA. Interpersonal and intentional injuries were significantly associated with a higher risk of thoracic spine fractures (RR 1.8, CI 1.1-2.9). Road traffic accidents were significantly associated with a higher risk of scapular/clavicular fractures (RR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.5) and a higher risk of tibial/fibula fractures (RR 3.5, CI 1.2-10.3) Conclusion: The majority of polytrauma patients seen at CMJAH were young males, who sustained injuries during road traffic accidents. Fractures accounted for 94% of all orthopaedic injuries. The most common orthopaedic injury detected in our cohort, overall, was a spinal fracture, most commonly involving the cervical spine. A patient involved in a road traffic accident is 3.5 times more likely to sustain a tibia/fibular fracture as opposed to any other fracture. The most common non-orthopaedic injury sustained was a chest injury. Importantly, 1 in 4 of these patients sustained an associated cervical spine injury and 1 in 3 a pelvic injury, similarly with head injuries. The most common combination of injuries is a chest injury with an associated pelvic/sacral fracture secondary to a pedestrian vehicle accident. The findings highlight the significant burden of orthopaedic injuries in polytrauma patients. In addition, the findings of this study, highlight injury patterns that should be anticipated in polytrauma patients.