The Battle of Indodla (social grant money)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

Abstract

This study critically examines the impact of South Africa’s social grant system, administered by the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA), in rural and township communities. It focuses on the transition from community-based to centralised grant payment systems in the last two decades, assessing how this shift influences the dignity and agency of social grant recipients. This paper is framed within the National Development Plan (NDP), which aims to foster rural economic development, financial inclusion, and social cohesion. The study explores the complex intersection between social assistance and broader socio-economic transformation. This study uses the long-form narrative format to investigate how social grants have been administered over the years by scrutinising the challenges and opportunities experienced by social grant recipients. This is done using qualitative research methods, in particular, interviews and case studies, and is presented in the long-form narrative journalism style. The findings reveal that while a centralised payment model has facilitated greater financial inclusion, it has also introduced logistical difficulties, compromising the dignity of some beneficiaries. The research contributes to ongoing debates on optimising social assistance programmes to support rural development, enhance human dignity, and align with the broader objectives of economic transformation in South Africa

Description

A research report submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts, in the Faculty of Humanities, Law and Management, School of Literature, Language and Media, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2025

Citation

Oliphant, Lumka . (2025). The Battle of Indodla (social grant money) [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/49468

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By