Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Masters)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37931

Browse

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Critical incidents in gynaecology: audit at Charlotte Maxeke, Johannesburg Academic Hospital
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023-07) Chikwiri, Christopher; Chauke, Lawrence
    Background: Critical incidents are among the ten leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Improving patient safety has become a global priority and one way to reach this goal is to report and analyse critical incidents. Objectives: To describe the epidemiology, patient outcomes and avoidable factors associated with critical incidents in gynaecology department at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CJMAH). Methods: This research was a retrospective descriptive analysis of critical incidents in patients admitted to gynaecology wards at CMJAH from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019. All medical records of patients identified to have experienced critical incidents were reviewed and demographic information, timing of admission, critical incident markers and avoidable factors were extracted for analysis. Results: In total there were 257 critical incidents (CI) in 2082 gynaecology admissions during the one-year study period, which gives a critical incidence of 12.3%. A total of 158 patients experienced at least one or more critical incidents. The mean age (SD) of patients was 41.1 (14.8) years. The median (IQR) duration of admission was 6 days (3-10). Reasons for admission were emergencies 60 (38.0%), elective 54 (34.2%), oncology 44 (27.8%). Majority of the critical incident events were omission of procedures (n=45, 17.5%), deaths (n=34, 13.2%), massive transfusion (n=30, 11.7%), repeat laparotomies (n=29,11.3%) and fistula/organ damage (n=19, 7.4%). Avoidable critical incidents were (n=87, 55.1%). Most critical incidents were associated with no harmful outcomes to the patients (50, 31.5%), death (34, 22.8%) (mainly as a result on oncology admissions), moderate disability (29,17.9%), minimal disability (26, 16,1%), permanent/severe disability (14, 8.6%) and in (5,3.1%) harm could not be specified. Critical incidents forms were only filled out in 39 patients, that is a reporting rate of 24.7%. Conclusions: Critical incidents are a major cause of unnecessary harm in gynaecology at CMJAH. Half of these critical incidents are avoidable and therefore corrective measures can be undertaken to eliminate them in order to improve patient safety. Underreporting of critical incidents is still a major problem. There is need for precise definitions of critical incidents terms and modification of critical incident reporting system (including electronic) to promote patient safety culture in gynaecology.