The influence of curing and surface preparation on the adhesion of protective coatings on concrete
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2010-03-15T11:43:49Z
Authors
Benn, Bernard Thomas
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In cases where concrete has to be repaired or protected due to exposure to an
aggressive environment, a protective coating is often used. The guidelines
referenced on the subject of repairs and coatings of concrete require the substrate
must be clean, dry and free from loose material but no mention is made of a
preferred method of surface preparation.
This research report presents details of an investigation in which concrete was
subjected to different curing regimes in order to induce different qualities of surface
concrete. The different surface qualities were prepared using four alternative surface
preparation methods prior to coating. After an initial investigation, five different
coatings were chosen in order to cover a broad spectrum of coatings available to the
construction industry.
Once the applied coatings had cured they were tested using a pull-off testing device
to determine the adhesion properties. The mode of failure was determined by visual
examination. In addition, surface characteristics were determined using an optical
microscope and the water sorptivity test.
Results indicate that preparing the surface before application of coatings does
improve adhesion. The preparation that was easiest to carry out, and which also
gave the best adhesion results, was the wire brushing technique. Considering the
practicality for site application, the mechanical method would be most appropriate.
From the findings, aliphatic coating exhibited the best adhesion properties, while
epoxy resin and cementitious-based materials also gave satisfactory results.
B T Benn 7231599 iii
Elastomeric coating with lower adhesion strengths at early ages may be suited to
surfaces that are expected to crack, as the elastic nature of the material will bridge
the gap. Masonry paint, which was only used for comparative purpose did not
perform as well as expected and had the lowest bond strengths. Where the removal
of defective concrete is likely to result in a rough surface the cementitious material
may be preferable.