An action research study of the REFLECT approach in rural Lesotho

dc.contributor.authorAttwood, Gillian
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T13:03:10Z
dc.date.available2022-02-15T13:03:10Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.descriptionA thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Faculty of Humanities, School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, 2007en_ZA
dc.description.abstractDevelopment, literacy, empowerment and participation are timeworn words that have been woven together in varying constellations over the last few decades. A recent approach to adult education and social change, REFLECT1, has brought these concepts together in a new manner. This study, conducted over a five and a half year period, (June 2000 to December 2005), set out to investigate whether REFLECT was responsive to the needs of adults in two rural Lesotho contexts: an income generating co-operative, and a village context. I enquired into participants’ experiences of REFLECT, asking whether it could strengthen participants’ practices and livelihoods. What benefits were gained? Did literacy practices change? Were participants empowered? What were the challenges experienced? The theoretical framework of this study has been informed by critical and postmodern theory. These theoretical lenses have shaped my investigation and critique of concepts relevant to the study, namely development, power, participation, and literacy. Using an Action Research design, data was collected and analysed using participatory and collaborative methods, including focus groups, interviews, document and photograph analysis, observations, as well as journal and field notes. Results are reported as case studies providing a rich description of the project within the two contexts of the study. Results show that communities which used REFLECT benefited on personal and communal levels. Participants implemented their own learning and development agendas and took action to improve their livelihoods. Human and social capital were fortified; people increased their participation in meaningful decision making; and engaged more extensively in development initiatives. Participants became more selfconfident, strengthened their capabilities and took action to access resources and 1 Regenerated Freirean Literacy through Empowering Community Techniques make substantial changes in their lives. In sum, REFLECT stimulated a positive change process. However, it was noted that implementing REFLECT is a demanding process. Ongoing support is required to sustain effective learning and change, particularly where facilitators are not highly literate and operate in resource poor contexts where development related needs are perceived as more critical than the need to improve literacy skills. The challenge is to create a context where literacy and development are integrally related in practice, with new norms developed to foster sustained learning around development related action.en_ZA
dc.description.librarianTL (2022)en_ZA
dc.facultyFaculty of Educationen_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/32746
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.phd.titlePHDen_ZA
dc.schoolSchool of Educationen_ZA
dc.titleAn action research study of the REFLECT approach in rural Lesothoen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
GIllian Attwood_PhD_ABSTRACT.pdf
Size:
10.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Abstract
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Gillian Attwood_PHD_An Action Research Study of the REFLECT approach in rural Lesotho.pdf
Size:
9.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Work
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections