An analysis of whether the Two‐Pillar Solution is an equitable solution for developing countries in addressing tax challenges of a digital economy

dc.article.end-page67
dc.article.start-page1
dc.contributor.authorVan Dyk, Tertia
dc.contributor.supervisorBlumenthal , Roy
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T13:02:23Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T13:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionA research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce in the field of Taxation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2022
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research report is to determine whether key elements of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) Two‐Pillar Solution are equitable to developing countries. The key principles contained in the Two‐Pillar Solution will be critically discussed to determine whether these rules are designed in a manner that: I. Allows for appropriate and acceptable tax competition for developing countries to fairly compete with larger economies; and II. Ensures that multinational enterprises pay adequate tax in the developing countries where they operate, extract value and generate profits. The report seeks to understand who the key role players are, what base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) challenges have arisen caused by the digitalisation of the global economy, and how the OECD Two‐Pillar Solution seeks to address these challenges. This analysis is conducted through the lens of developing countries, which are vulnerable to inequitable allocation of taxing rights. The report seeks to assess whether the key elements of the Two‐Pillar Solution are consistent with existing international tax rules that govern the allocation of taxing rights and, in some instances, challenges whether the existing rules on international tax are equitable to developing countries in the first place. The role of tax policy and tax competition from the perspective of developing countries will be discussed. Finally, the effectiveness of alternative mechanisms to address tax abuse will be assessed, including digital services tax and controlled foreign company rules, will be examined. Key Words: Multinational enterprises, base erosion and profit shifting, BEPS, inclusive framework, Global Anti‐Base Erosion Model, developing countries, tax incentives, controlled foreign company rules, effective tax rate, low‐taxed income, G20, digital services tax, Organisation for Economic Co‐Operation and Development
dc.description.submitterMM2024
dc.facultyFaculty of Commerce, Law and Management
dc.identifier.citationVan Dyk, Tertia. (2022). An analysis of whether the Two‐Pillar Solution is an equitable solution for developing countries in addressing tax challenges of a digital economy [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg].
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/38624
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2022 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolSchool of Accountancy
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectMultinational enterprises
dc.subjectBase erosion and profit shifting
dc.subjectBEPS
dc.subjectInclusive framework
dc.subjectGlobal Anti‐Base Erosion Model
dc.subjectDeveloping countries
dc.subjectControlled foreign company rules
dc.subjectLow‐taxed income
dc.subjectDigital services tax
dc.subjectOrganisation for Economic Co‐Operation and Development
dc.subject.otherSDG-8: Decent work and economic growth
dc.titleAn analysis of whether the Two‐Pillar Solution is an equitable solution for developing countries in addressing tax challenges of a digital economy
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Van Dyk_Analysis_2024.pdf
Size:
702.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: