Development of an interprofessional education and collaborative practice curriculum for health science students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University

Abstract

A South African university required a contextually relevant, Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice (IPECP) curriculum. The study aimed to develop and validate an IPECP curriculum for health sciences students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU). Planning the IPECP curriculum necessitated both a robust theoretical foundation and pragmatic problem-solving and comprised three phases. Phase I, the situational analysis included a scoping review of global peer-reviewed literature, focus groups with students and lecturers, and a university-wide needs survey. Brookfield’s lenses of critical reflection and reflexivity condensed results of the situational analysis into factors guiding curriculum planning. Phase II included a curriculum map analysis of profession-specific curricula of the eleven professions: occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech language pathology and audiology, human nutrition and dietetics, nursing, medicine, radiography, pharmacy, dentistry, dental therapy, and oral hygiene. The curriculum mapping involved consultation with professions’ representatives in combination with information extracted from LOOOP, an electronic curriculum mapping programme. The analysis identified the gaps in addressing interprofessional collaboration core-competencies and highlighted common topics, in the professions’ specific curricula. From the curriculum foundation laid by Phase I and II, an IPECP curriculum framework and design principles were conceptualised using a Curriculum Development Research design. In Phase III, the proposed SMU-IPECP curriculum and accompanying design principles were refined during iterative stages of design, development, testing and revision. Internal and external participants validated the curriculum by rating the relevance, consistency, practicality, and feasibility of the four-year, longitudinal curriculum. A modified Delphi guided consensus on the design principles. The curriculum escalated interprofessional role development from mere exposure to immersion, striving for competent representation in research, ethics and Primary Health care. The build-up followed a trajectory from a professional individualised role in the team, to students fulfilling a dual identity of professional and an interprofessional practice-ready practitioner, who practices in an evidence-based collaborative way as a primary health care advocate, in their final year. The curriculum validation highlighted affordances and constraints for future implementation. During validation, participants agreed on the design and commended the proposed IPECP curriculum. Although the curriculum was planned for a specific university, the theoretical design principles developed through this research process could potentially be customised to fit similar university contexts.