Space use variation in Co-occurring sister species: Response to environmental variation or competition?

dc.contributor.authorDufour, C.M.S.
dc.contributor.authorMeynard, C.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, J.
dc.contributor.authorPillay, N.
dc.contributor.authorGanem, G.
dc.contributor.authorRioux, C.
dc.contributor.authorBenhamou, S.
dc.contributor.authorPerez, J.
dc.contributor.authorDu Plessis, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorAvenant, N.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T08:04:00Z
dc.date.available2016-06-03T08:04:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.description.abstractCoexistence often involves niche differentiation either as the result of environmental divergence, or in response to competition. Disentangling the causes of such divergence requires that environmental variation across space is taken into account, which is rarely done in empirical studies. We address the role of environmental variation versus competition in coexistence between two rodent species: Rhabdomys bechuanae (bechuanae) and Rhabdomys dilectus dilectus (dilectus) comparing their habitat preference and home range (HR) size in areas with similar climates, where their distributions abut (allopatry) or overlap (sympatry). Using Outlying Mean Index analyses, we test whether habitat characteristics of the species deviate significantly from a random sample of available habitats. In allopatry, results suggest habitat selection: dilectus preferring grasslands with little bare soil while bechuanae occurring in open shrublands. In sympatry, shrubland type habitats dominate and differences are less marked, yet dilectus selects habitats with more cover than bechuanae. Interestingly, bechuanae shows larger HRs than dilectus, and both species display larger HRs in sympatry. Further, HR overlaps between species are lower than expected. We discuss our results in light of data on the phylogeography of the genus and propose that evolution in allopatry resulted in adaptation leading to different habitat preferences, even at their distribution margins, a divergence expected to facilitate coexistence. However, since sympatry occurs in sites where environmental characteristics do not allow complete species separation, competition may explain reduced inter-species overlap and character displacement in HR size. This study reveals that both environmental variation and competition may shape species coexistence.en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDufour, C.M.S. et al. 2015. Space use variation in Co-occurring sister species: Response to environmental variation or competition? PLoS ONE 10(2).en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/20415
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_ZA
dc.subjectadulten_ZA
dc.subjectallopartryen_ZA
dc.subjectanimal behavioren_ZA
dc.subjectanimal experimenten_ZA
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_ZA
dc.subjectecological nicheen_ZA
dc.subjectenvironmental aspects and related phenomenaen_ZA
dc.subjectenvironmental variationen_ZA
dc.subjecthabitat selectionen_ZA
dc.subjecthabitat useen_ZA
dc.subjecthome rangeen_ZA
dc.subjectintraspecific competitionen_ZA
dc.subjectmouseen_ZA
dc.subjectnonhumanen_ZA
dc.subjectphylogeographyen_ZA
dc.subjectRhabdomys bechuanaeen_ZA
dc.subjectRhabdomys dilectusen_ZA
dc.subjectrodenten_ZA
dc.subjectspecies coexistenceen_ZA
dc.subjectspecies comparisonen_ZA
dc.subjectspecies differentiationen_ZA
dc.subjectsympatryen_ZA
dc.subjectRhabdomysen_ZA
dc.subjectRodentiaen_ZA
dc.titleSpace use variation in Co-occurring sister species: Response to environmental variation or competition?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Space use variation in Co-occurring sister species - Response to environmental variation or competition.pdf
Size:
539.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: