Mandatory Vaccinations in the Workplace: Lessons for the Next Pandemic

dc.contributor.authorMostert, Heleen Lucille
dc.contributor.supervisorPillay, Karmini
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-05T07:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionA research report submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Laws, in the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2025
dc.description.abstractThe World Health Organization (‘WHO’) declared the SARS-CoV-2 (‘COVID-19’) outbreak a pandemic on 11 March 2020. The South African government took heed of the WHO’s response principles and declared, per section 27(5)(c) of the Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 (‘DMA’), a National State of Disaster (‘NSD’) on 15 March 2020. Various countries responded to the COVID-19 pandemic (‘the pandemic’) by mandating the vaccination of their workforce in designated labour industries. Inversely, the South African government opted for an intermediate approach by neither mandating nor prohibiting the mandating of COVID-19 vaccination. Instead, the government gave employers the statutory regulated discretion, in accordance with the Consolidated Direction on Occupational Health and Safety Measures in Certain Workplaces in GN 499 GG 44700 of 11 June 2021 (‘the Direction’), on whether to mandate employee vaccination. The pandemic underscored vaccine hesitancy and reshaped vaccine policies, resulting in occupational and socioeconomic implications for unvaccinated employees. I analyse these implications, vaccine hesitancy, and the regulation of occupational vaccine mandates. Legal development – premised on lessons drawn from the pandemic – can be observed globally. South Africa would be well-placed to keep up with global legal developments when deliberating on prospective occupational vaccine policies. I, therefore, consider international law, South African law, and the foreign laws of Australia, New Zealand (‘NZ’), and the United States of America (‘U.S.’) to draw lessons from the pandemic and inform vaccine policies in preparation for the next pandemic. I assess to what extent these legal developments have balanced public health with labour stakeholders’ competing interests, rights, and duties (‘the balance’).
dc.description.submitterMM2026
dc.facultyFaculty of Commerce, Law and Management
dc.identifier.citationMostert, Heleen Lucille. (2025). Mandatory Vaccinations in the Workplace: Lessons for the Next Pandemic [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/50132
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2025 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolSchool of Law
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectCOVID-19 Pandemic
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.subjectOccupational Vaccine Mandates
dc.subjectVaccine Hesitancy
dc.subjectPandemic Preparedness
dc.subject.primarysdgSDG-3: Good health and well-being
dc.titleMandatory Vaccinations in the Workplace: Lessons for the Next Pandemic
dc.typeDissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mostert_Mandatory_2025.pdf
Size:
790.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: