Social detox
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2010-07-12T08:50:59Z
Authors
Hartmann, Renn
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The extent of animal abuse, neglect and abandonment places increased pressure on animal welfare organisations to protect the welfare of animals. Such
organisations operate under restricting circumstances, doing what they can with what they have and under heavy reliance on support from the public.
What is becoming inherently more recognised is that animal abuse has definite psychological implications on individuals within society, be they perpetrators or
witnesses. More so, there is a definite correlation between the prevalence of animal abuse and the particular state of a social environment. The ability of a
social environment to foster socially toxic (socially toxicity1) aspects not only influences the prevalence of animal abandonment, abuse and neglect, but more so,
through these conditions and these acts of violation upon animals, individuals (perpetrators or witnesses) may become psychologically distanced from healthy moral
and ethical behaviour in society.
An environment that is specifically attuned to the links between animal abuse and social-toxicity is the South African township. It is an environment
predominated by social-toxicity and has little to no animal care facilities or animal welfare education initiatives and hence presents opportunities for the expansion of
elementary ideas into a comprehensive solution.
‘The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way
its animals are treated’ (Mahatma Ghandi).
If one acknowledges the positive impacts of human-animal interaction on the psychological health of humans, then attempts at addressing the influences of socialtoxicity
on the psychology of humans, and in promoting animal care and animal welfare education, must stress the aspect of human-animal interaction within a
succinctly tuned architectural environment. Stressing this aspect is achievable through Animal Assisted Activities (AAA)2, Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT)3 and critically,
through the dissolution of ‘typical’ animal housing into an interactive environment that is beneficial to both the human and animal participant.
Of particular importance is the understanding of the synergistic nature of social conditions (i.e. how one condition does not act in isolation from another). This aspect,
combined with attempts at rejuvenating the human-animal bond in townships, indicates the significance in the dissolution of theoretical knowledge, gained through
the research process, into an architectural scheme; if purposeful sensitivity is to be achieved. Responses of an architectural nature not only articulate a dialogue
between operational functions and space but are also based on the requirement of space, in itself, to formulate a dialogue with the user; an experiential dialogue
based on spatial richness and variety taking cognisance of the fact that the built environment has its role to play in inferring positive spatial associations within disadvantaged areas