Comparing health inequalities in maternal health: An analysis of the South African Demographic and Health Surveys (SADHS) 1998 and 2016

Abstract

Background: Inadequate access to maternal health services (MHS) is directly linked to maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. South Africa (SA) is known to be an unequal society. Researching and documenting the utilisation and access to MHS can assist in the appropriate redirection of services to ensure equitable service delivery. The study identifies differences in MHS access between ethnicity groups, residence, province, maternal education level and household wealth quintile. The study quantifies the inequalities in access to MHS in SA in 1998 and 2016, and then evaluates the change in inequalities between the two periods. Methods: Data was analysed from the 1998 and 2016 South African Demographic and Health Surveys. First. the study identifies differences in MHS access between ethnic groups, residence, province, maternal education level and household wealth quintile using regression analyses. Then, the inequalities related to access of MHS in 1998 and 2016 are calculated using the relative (RII) and slope (SII) index of inequality and the concentration index (CI). Lastly, the inequalities between 1998 and 2016 were compared using generalised linear models, indicating whether inequalities increased, decreased, or remained the same. All analyses were done in Stata and adjusted for the multistage-stratified sampling of the surveys. Results: Utilisation of MHS in SA varies between different groups based on ethnicity, residence, province, mothers’ education level, and wealth quintile. In 1998 and 2016, Black/African women have the least utilisation of all MHS. A clear pattern is seen where women with higher education and high wealth quintile, have increased MHS utilisation. In most cases, the inequalities narrowed between 1998 and 2016 for all MHS. However, inequalities are still present in 2016 for many MHS. For example, using simple inequality measures, the largest inequalities in 2016 are seen between women of different ethnicities accessing four or more antenatal visits (ANC4), where there is a 11.1 percentage point difference between the highest group (White & Indian/Asian) and the lowest group (Black/African). For complex inequality measures, there are still significant relative and absolute inequalities in antenatal visits in 2016 for maternal education (RII: 1.25; SII: 1.14) and household wealth quintile (RII: 1.23; SII: 1.11). Conclusions: Between 1998 and 2016, population-level utilisation to MHS increased in all MHS and the majority of within group inequalities narrowed over time. However, inequalities still exist in all maternal health outcomes. SA has implemented multiple programmes and policies to address inequalities in MHS and decrease maternal mortality and morbidity. However, these need to be continuously monitored and evaluated based on the latest data to ensure that efforts are going towards addressing the specific groups where inequalities are still present.