The constitutionality of trophy hunting of threatened or protected listed species in South Africa
| dc.contributor.author | Lopes, Rui Jorge Coelho | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Cameron, Justice Emeritus Edwin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-27T09:00:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-27T09:00:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description | A research report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws by Coursework and Research Report at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Whilst South Africa continues to grapple with its radical levels of social and economic inequality within the country, the lucrativeness of natural resources forming part of the environment as a tool to bringing about redress to such inequalities becomes an ever-increasing consideration. Although there is merit in the statement that the use of natural resources may seek to alleviate social and economic inequality, our courts have already held that the provisions of section 24(b)(iii) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (the “Constitution”) are required to link and intertwine the concepts of conservation with sustainable use and development, for unfettered use of natural resources may not be regarded as sustainable, and will ultimately lead to the decline of ecological conservation and biodiversity. This has, however, contributed to the increase in human-wildlife conflict and the increase in consumptive and extractive use practices in relation to the natural resources of the environment, and the consideration of trophy hunting, and in particular the trophy hunting of Threatened and Protected Species (“TOPS Species”) is not separate n or excluded from this consideration and the ultimate impact such has on biodiversity loss and ecological degradation. The continued race to the bottom of species both locally and globally, coupled with the vested financial gains sought to be obtained from the increased rarity of species subjected to trophy 3 hunts, seeks to bring into question whether the engaging or permitting of the trophy hunting of TOPS Species may fall foul of the provisions of section 24 of the Constitution. Accordingly, this research report seeks to consider the constitutionality of the trophy hunting of TOPS Species and how this practice is required to be viewed through the constitutional lens under which it takes place | |
| dc.description.submitter | MM2024 | |
| dc.faculty | Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Lopes, Rui Jorge Coelho . (2023). The constitutionality of trophy hunting of threatened or protected listed species in South Africa [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WireDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/38766 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10539/38766 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
| dc.rights | © 2022 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. | |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
| dc.school | School of Law | |
| dc.subject | Social and economic inequality | |
| dc.subject | Trophy hunting | |
| dc.subject | Species | |
| dc.subject | UCTD | |
| dc.subject.other | SDG-10: Reduced inequalities | |
| dc.title | The constitutionality of trophy hunting of threatened or protected listed species in South Africa | |
| dc.type | Dissertation |