Exploration of audit quality disclosures contained in the transparency reports of audit firms
| dc.article.end-page | 84 | |
| dc.article.start-page | 1 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Raphadu, Mpya Aaron | |
| dc.contributor.supervisor | Buchling, Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-11T13:15:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-11T13:15:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description | A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law, and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce in Accountancy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the disclosure practices of audit firms issued in the transparency reports. This study uses audit quality standards to assess how disclosures regarding audit quality have been included in the audit transparency reports. Methodology: This study analysed the publicly available transparency reports of the big 4 audit firms and medium audit firms. These reports were analysed following an interpretive approach to determining the extent of disclosure on audit quality from 2016 to 2020. This study also considered the change in disclosure on audit quality over these five years. A disclosure checklist has been developed using professional literature. Content analysis has been used to codify the disclosed information with disclosures being scored using an ordinal scale. Descriptive statistics have been used to analyse and graphically present the data. Findings: The findings suggest inconsistencies in the preparation of the transparency reports. The number of disclosures did not increase significantly from 2016 to 2020, even though there was increased public scrutiny of the audit firms in the wake of audit failures over the same period. Additionally, the big 4 audit firms provided more disclosures compared to medium-tier firms. Research limitations: The research is limited to the publicly available transparency reports and, therefore, the findings are not representative of all assurance providers in the South African market Practical implications: The findings can be used to aid audit regulators in understanding inconsistencies in audit firm transparency reports to develop assurance reporting frameworks. Additionally, the findings can inform regulators of these reporting issues about audit quality indicators. Value: This study complements the current research by providing insight into audit firms' disclosure practices in audit transparency reports. Current research has been focussed on corporate governance-specific disclosures | |
| dc.description.submitter | MM2024 | |
| dc.faculty | Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Raphadu, Mpya Aaron. (2022). Exploration of audit quality disclosures contained in the transparency reports of audit firms [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10539/38639 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
| dc.rights | © 2022 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. | |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg | |
| dc.school | School of Accountancy | |
| dc.subject | Audit quality | |
| dc.subject | Audit quality management system | |
| dc.subject | Transparency report | |
| dc.subject | Audit firms | |
| dc.subject | UCTD | |
| dc.subject.other | SDG-8: Decent work and economic growth | |
| dc.title | Exploration of audit quality disclosures contained in the transparency reports of audit firms | |
| dc.type | Dissertation |