Protecting Traditional Medical Knowledge: A Critique of South Africa’s Sui Generis Framework

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

Abstract

South Africa amended and implemented laws that are heavily based on Western and conventional intellectual property (IP) laws to protect Traditional Medical Knowledge (TMK). These laws have been found to be inadequate in catering to the unique nature of TMK, necessitating alternative protection mechanisms such as sui generis frameworks that fall outside the scope of the conventional IP system. South Africa has recently established its own sui generis framework under the Protection, Promotion, Development, and Management of Indigenous Knowledge Act 6 of 2019 (TK Act). Although the South African sui generis framework is a promising initiative to protect TMK, it is not without its challenges. This research report examines the challenges of protecting TMK in South Africa. It critically analyses both the conventional IP system and the TK Act for TMK protection. Findings reveal that neither the conventional IP system nor the sui generis framework alone provides a comprehensive solution for the protection of TMK. Instead, the report proposes a hybrid approach that integrates elements from both the conventional IP and sui generis systems. The report concludes by recommending a flexible and adaptable system that accommodates the dynamic nature of TMK while fostering innovation. It highlights the need for ongoing conversations between academics, policymakers, and indigenous communities to improve the mechanisms aimed at protecting TMK.

Description

A research report submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Laws, in the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2025

Citation

Mahapa, Selaelo. (2024). Protecting Traditional Medical Knowledge: A Critique of South Africa’s Sui Generis Framework [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/49363

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By