South African Climate Change Regulation: Towards Climate Change Mitigation

dc.article.end-page59
dc.article.start-page1
dc.contributor.authorManzella, Marco John
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T11:03:15Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07T11:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionA research report Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws by Coursework and Research Report at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2022
dc.description.abstractClimate change is the change in earth’s weather and climactic conditions due to an average rise in the temperature of the earth’s surface. This temperature increase has principally resulted from an exponential increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from anthropogenic activity. The consequences of climate change are experienced differently by different regions and the effects can reach across the globe ranging from minor to catastrophic proportions depending on the location of a country. The international response to this crisis has accelerated significantly since the early 1990s and the formation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). South Africa acknowledges the threat of climate change; however, the country has a strained relationship with climate change mitigation as one of earth’s highest emitters of GHGs per capita due to its dependency on coal combustion. This dependency is further complicated by the sector’s status as a primary employment and socio-economic driver domestically. These competing priorities impact upon South Africa’s climate change response. South Africa has advanced climate change mitigation to a limited extent through the slow development of a domestic regulatory framework. The mitigation effort is hampered by some shortfalls in the domestic regulatory framework. The country currently lacks climate change law. This paper seeks to determine how capable South Africa’s domestic framework is of facilitating climate change mitigation. It espouses the view that a robust and comprehensive regulatory framework is necessary for meaningful domestic mitigation action. It emphasizes the importance of regulatory certainty – where adoption and enforcement of the framework are concerned. The current regulatory framework – despite its fragmented, ad hoc nature – is already advancing limited mitigation action. This limited success can be amplified by the adoption of a better developed, more comprehensive framework
dc.description.submitterMM2024
dc.facultyFaculty of Commerce, Law and Management
dc.identifier.citationManzella, Marco John. (2022). The role of design houses [Master’s dissertation , University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WireDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/38612
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/38612
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.rights© 2022 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.schoolSchool of Law
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectClimactic conditions
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas (GHG)
dc.subjectClimate change mitigation
dc.subject.otherSDG-13: Climate action
dc.titleSouth African Climate Change Regulation: Towards Climate Change Mitigation
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Manzella_South_2024.pdf
Size:
592 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: