Amygdaloid and Hippocampal Volumetric Variations and the Effects of the Feelings of Hopelessness and Helplessness

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

Abstract

Volumetry was performed on the basis pontis, amygdaloid body, and hippocampus proper in 700 normal MRI scans. The volume of the basis pontis was found to remain relatively constant across all age groups until the eighth decade. The consistency of volume of the basis pontis was used to derive volume ratios of the amygdaloid body and hippocampus proper. The volumes of the amygdaloid body and hippocampus proper remained relatively constant until the end of the sixth decade after which atrophy became significant. The volume ratio of the right hippocampus was greater than the left over all age groups. These analyses provided a baseline from which comparisons to clinical cases could be made. Volumetry of the same three structures was performed on a cohort of 80 clinical MRI scans and correlated with scores of hopelessness and helplessness derived from self- reporting questionnaires. A correlation was noted of hippocampal proper atrophy and amygdaloid body atrophy in relation to helplessness, but with questionable significance. Further studies exploring these relationships are required to fully determine potential relationships and diagnostic significance between amygdaloid body and hippocampus proper atrophy and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Description

A research report submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science , in the Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2024

Citation

Weinberg, Ian Robert. (2024).Amygdaloid and Hippocampal Volumetric Variations and the Effects of the Feelings of Hopelessness and Helplessness [Master`s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. WIReDSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/10539/46897

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By