The African M&E Hub

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/27946

The Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA) is one of the six regional centers housed in academic institutions across the globe. We work to improve the way in which monitoring and evaluation is done in the Anglophone Africa region. We help clients and governments build capacity at national, regional, and local levels to measure development progress and outcomes, strengthen evidence-based policy-making, and increase government accountability and transparency.

Social media sites

Twitter: @CLEARAA1 LinkedIn: CLEAR Anglophone Africa Facebook: CLEAR Anglophone Africa

Website: http://www.wits.ac.za/clear-aa

CLEAR.AnglophoneAfrica@wits.ac.za

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Leaving no one behind: Evaluation for 2030
    (UNDP, 2020-09) UNDP’s NEC Conference and team
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of Public procurement on the functioning of a National Evaluation Systems: The case of South Africa
    (International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 2020-01) Dr. Kithatu-Kiwekete, Angelita; Dr. Phillips, Sean
    The practice of evaluation is gaining importance across governments in Africa. Country-driven evaluation should enhance the government’s capacity for accountability, knowledge management, performance, as well as improved decision making. Countries that have implemented national evaluation systems include Benin, Uganda, and South Africa. Emerging research tends to focus on methodologies or sector-specific aspects of evaluation. This article examines the specific challenge of public procurement for conducting evaluations as knowledge-based services. The article is based on a baseline study. The methodology for the study involved a literature review; in-depth interviews; focus groups with government officials, evaluation suppliers, trainers, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs); a root-cause analysis workshop; and an online survey with both clients and suppliers. The findings are that the quality of government procurement and supply chain management is a major factor that affects the supply of evaluators. The article concludes by offering recommendations to enhance the process of public procurement.