4. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) - Faculties submissions

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37773

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    South Africa’s Economic Foreign Policy: A Study of Slow Maturation
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023-10) Nemalili, Lusani; Gwatiwa, Tshepo
    In the international environment, all state relations are guided by a foreign policy that conveys what a state intends to achieve through its relations with other states. Foreign policy is the means used to express a state’s national interests internationally to other states whilst executing on its domestic policy making, strategies and decisions. Therefore, foreign policy is the translation of domestic national interests to an international audience for engagement. However, national interests vary according to what the state aims to fulfil abroad. They could be economic, social, security, political interests. Nevertheless, it remains critical that economic interests have always dominated the international relations arena. Thus, a convergence of foreign policy and domestic economic policy of a state are crucial for its international success that contributes to its economic growth within and beyond its borders. This convergence produces an economic foreign policy. An economic foreign policy then guides the decisions of policymakers and diplomatic practices of the state bureaucracy in achieving the state’s national interests abroad. The presence of an economic foreign policy in a state is important because decisions that different actors (state and non-state) make in the international environment have to be accounted for and guided by a policy in order to understand the reasoning and logic behind them. The absence of an economic foreign policy enables a state to operate on an ad hoc decision-making basis in the international environment and with outcomes whose impact cannot be measured nor monitored by the state itself or other states intending to form economic relations with it. South Africa, with its economic interests, goals and a foreign policy, has not yet produced a coherent, codified and well-expressed economic foreign policy for an international audience. Whilst the country has relevant actors and the right processes to produce an economic foreign policy, it has not brought one into maturity through the consolidation and unification of foreign and economic policies of the state. This is due to several domestic conditions in policy making, decisions and processes that prohibit the realisation of an economic foreign policy. It is in these domestic foreign and economic policy making environments that the enquiry of this study is found to reveal the reasons why South Africa has not had a matured economic foreign policy since the new democratic dispensation of 1994.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Oil shocks and macroeconomic policy uncertainty in South Africa
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023) Makanda, Samantha; Fasanya, Ismail
    The study reevaluates the connection between oil shocks and macroeconomic policy uncertainty in South Africa over the period of 1990M1 to 2022M6 using spillover connectedness frameworks and Quantile-on-quantile regression analysis. The link between oil shocks andmacroeconomy rests on the Neoclassical theory following the Hamilton (2005) production function framework. The following findings are apparent from the analysis. First, the average- based connectedness framework shows a moderate connection between oil shocks and macroeconomic policy uncertainty parameters. Economic policy uncertainty and political uncertainty exhibit the most prominent bi-directional spillovers, while political uncertainty and oil consumption demand shocks function as net spillover transmitters. However, using the quantile approach, the level of connectedness between oil shocks and macroeconomic policy uncertainty parameters is stronger and much higher at both tails of the conditional distribution. Specifically, the study finds that macroeconomic policy uncertainty parameters act as net receivers at lower quantiles, while all the oil shocks and financial policy uncertainty act as net receivers at median quantiles, and economic activity shocks and oil inventory demand shocks act as net receivers at upper quantiles. Thus, the application of the average based framework of connectedness is inadequate and restrictive. Finally, using the Quantile-on-Quantile regression analysis, the results demonstrate a substantial positive (negative) relationship between the upper quantiles of oil shocks and the lower (upper) quantiles of macroeconomic policy uncertainty. These findings suggest that policymakers keep an eye on the repercussions of oil shocks on macroeconomic conditions and develop monitoring frameworks that will help to predict the likely effects of external shocks emanating from oil. Simultaneously, investors should contemplate modifying their investment strategy regarding the circumstances and keep an eye on oil prices, government policies, and economic indicator