School of Accountancy (ETDs)
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37779
Browse
Search Results
Item Stakeholder and jurisdictional influence in IFRS standard setting: the case of IFRS 10(2019) De Freitas, Monica TeixeiraThe purpose of this paper explores the due process of accounting standard-setting by determining whether a stakeholder group and/or jurisdiction is more influential than other stakeholders/jurisdictions based on their acceptance/rejection rates relative to other stakeholders/jurisdictions. The legitimacy theory explains the findings and asks what consequences any bias may have for the IASB. This study expands the standard-setting literature by making use of the Bamber and McMeeking (2016) weighted method to IFRS 10. This study uses content analysis to analyse public comment letters and adopts Bamber & McMeeking’s (2016) methodology to control for the equal treatment of comments in answering the research questions. This paper answers the call to investigate allegations that the IASB standard-setting due process is influenced by specific stakeholders and jurisdictions, in this way, threatening their legitimacy. The limitation of this study is that the researcher considers IFRS 10 in isolation. As in prior work, the researcher concludes that although no single stakeholder/jurisdiction has a much greater influence over the IASB, there is some evidence of bias. Accounting firms appear to have significantly less influence than other stakeholders have. The IASB reacts less favourably to UK proposals than to those of the US. A lack of fairness (real or perceived) may jeopardise perceptions of the procedural legitimacy of the due process and, ultimately, impair the IASB's cognitive legitimacy.Item Market reaction to the FTSE/JSE responsible investment index series(2019) Usher, Hayden PhilipResponsible investment has seen considerable growth since the turn of the millennium, and this has spurred the creation and continuous development of responsible investment indexes across the globe. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the release of the RI index series contains price sensitive information content and therefore has value relevance for the market. Using event study methodology applied to the six releases of the FTSE/JSE Responsible Investment Index series from October 2015 to June 2018, this paper investigates the impact on the share prices of constituent, included and excluded firms from this index series. The study finds that the release of the constituents of the RI index does not contain new information content while constituents of the RI top 30 experience positive and statistically significant abnormal returns as a result of their constituency. The inclusion of firms on the RI index is not a release of new price-sensitive information, while firms included on the RI top 30 experience a sustained increase in share price throughout the event window. Firms excluded from the RI index and RI top 30 experience negative and statistically significant share returns and the market applies a greater discount toward firms excluded from the RI top 30. Finally, there are statistically significant differences between firms that were included and firms that were excluded from the RI index and the RI top 30 post-announcement date, and this is caused by the market applying a value discount toward firms with deteriorating ESG performance and disclosure. From an investors perspective, investors are able to generate significant arbitrage returns by shorting (longing) shares of firms expected to be to be excluded (included) from the RI index series. Consequently, firms should strive to be included or remain on the RI index series in order to signal the market that there has not been a deterioration in their ESG performance and disclosure, which would have a negative impact on their share price.