Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Masters)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37939

Browse

Start date: 2013End date: 2019

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bypassing the union: An Employer's Right to Negotiate Directly with Striking Employees
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2016-08) Nkosi, Thulani Gift; Mahomed, Shaheda
    South African labour law influenced by the Constitution and notions of equity and fairness has undergone a total change and will, without doubt, continue to change to meet the ever changing nature of employment it seeks to regulate. It is after all in the nature of all laws to change with the society they seek to regulate and our labour law is no exception. Recently, focus has shifted to the institution of collective bargaining and the questions posed are whether our labour laws as they currently stand are capable of adequately regulating the process of collective bargaining in such a way that the main objective of collective bargaining which is to bring about industrial peace is promoted and maintained at all times. These questions are posed on the back of the unprecedented spates of prolonged violent strikes that have resulted in the destruction of property and loss of life as well as unimaginable financial losses not only for the employers affected but also for the economy as a whole. These unprecedented prolonged violent strikes have caused employers to engage in bargaining conduct that could erode the participation of trade unions from the collective bargaining process which bargaining conduct takes the form of employers bypassing trade unions and negotiating with striking employees directly. But do employers have a right to bypass trade unions in this way? This paper investigates this question against the background of the case of Amcu v Lonmin where the Labour Court on application by a trade union had to decide whether to grant an urgent interdict restraining employers from negotiating directly with striking employees. The employers considering themselves to be acting within their rights opposed the application. The Labour Court unfortunately dismissed the application on technical grounds relating to the lack of urgency without considering or deciding this question. This paper accordingly picks up the debate; considers the historical evolution of collective bargaining in our labour law including the voluntarist argument that is said to be embodied by the Labour Relations Act (LRA), and concludes that when all things considered employers in fact do not have a right to bypass trade unions. If employers had this right certain provisions of the LRA that guarantee trade union participation would be rendered nugatory and the whole collective bargaining process would become unworkable. The LRA envisions that once parties have voluntarily embarked on collective bargaining they bargain in good faith and do not bypass each other.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Financial inclusion in South Africa: An analysis of the financial sector regulatory framework and proposals for reform
    (2018-09) Duma, Amanda; Kawadza, Herbert
    Abstract Not Available.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The authority of the United Nations Security Council to waive the personal immunity of heads of States in the context of international crimes
    (2019) Memela, Sinethemba
    In 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) was adopted with the aim of ending impunity for perpetrators of international crimes. Under Article 13(b) of the Rome Statute, if the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) refers a situation to the ICC while acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the ICC is entitled to exercise jurisdiction over the territory and nationals of the relevant State that. In some cases, the referred State is neither a party to the Rome Statute nor has consented to its jurisdiction, and implicated senior officials of the state enjoy immunity. In terms of Article 27 of the Rome Statute, immunity does not bar the ICC from exercising jurisdiction. However, customary international law has historically afforded immunity to senior State officials, such as Heads of State, from prosecution. This dichotomy has been a challenge in international criminal law; specifically, the question of balancing the competing objectives of ending impunity for international crimes while maintaining stable relations and respecting the sovereignty of States by respecting customary international law rules on immunity. This challenge has been compounded by the question of the implication of a UNSC referral, of a non-State party to the Rome Statute, to the ICC on the immunity of implicated senior state officials of that State. Accordingly, this study is primarily concerned with whether, and the extent to which, the UNSC can waive the immunity enjoyed by senior state officials of UN Member States, particularly Head of State immunity, when it refers a situation to the ICC using its Chapter VII powers in the UN Charter. Before dealing with the above, the study analyses the concept of immunity, specifically personal immunity, in international law and the obligations of States to respect such immunity, taking into consideration their obligations under the Rome Statute as applicable.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Caught in a gap? An examination and human rights assessment of immigration detention laws and practices in South Africa
    (2013-03-19) Tay, Roanna
    Abstract: This study examines the laws and practices relating to immigration detention in South Africa. It provides an in-depth examination of the legislation, with reference to known state practices and cases where migrants have been subjected to prolonged and repeated periods of immigration detention. The study highlights gaps in South African law that contribute to certain categories of migrants being especially vulnerable to immigration detention. Four categories are identified: (1) asylum seekers; (2) persons with difficulty obtaining travel documents; (3) stateless person; and (4) persons subject to other prohibitions against refoulement. The study offers recommendations for legislative reforms to fill the gaps in the law that contribute to these migrants’ vulnerability to immigration detention