Research Outputs (Oral Health Sciences)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/18776

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Marginal adaptation in composite resin restored dentine cavities Showing gross marginal leakage
    (1986) Grossman, E. S.; Sparrius, O.
    The aim of bonding composite resin restorations to the tooth is to ensure retention and also to prevent marginal leakage at the tooth restoration interface, a process which can lead to further caries. An in vitro marginal leakage study' of composite resins in combination wTEh acid' etching and dentine and enamel bonding agents highlighted the lower sealing potential of both enamel and dentine bonding agents to dentine (36%>seal) compared to enamel (79%>seal). Several studies 2-4 suggest that if the inner surface of the resin restoration appears as a well replicated negative impression of the adjacent tooth surface, bonding has been achieved. This study was undertaken to examine the appearance of the inner surface of resin restorations which showed gross marginal leakage in restored dentine cavities to determine the degree of marginal adaptation between the restoration and cavity surface.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of enamel etchants and a cleaning agent on cut dentine: an in vitro study
    (1985) Sparrius, O.; Grossman, E. S.
    Cavities 1,25 x 2,00mm were prepared in the cervical dentine of extracted human premolar teeth using a no. 577 tungsten carbide bur. The cavity depth was standardised at 1mm with the aid of a depth gauge fitted to the high speed airturbine. The cavities were hemisected with a low speed, water cooled, diamond disc saw, then cleaned with water and air. Thereafter the following solutions were applied to six cavities each as per manufacturers' instructions: Anhydron; Chemfill (Citric Acid); Enamelbond etchant and Scotchbond etchant gel. Once the cavities had been cleaned and dried, the specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and viewed at magnifications of x35, x200 and x2000. Cavity walls and floors were viewed separately and representative areas photographed. Similarly prepared unetched cavities served as a control.