Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Masters)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/10539/37975

Browse

Browsing Electronic Theses and Dissertations (Masters) by Keyword "Analytic Hierarchy Process"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Selection of an Optimal Tunnel Development Method for an Underground Mine Travelling Way Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2024-01) Meyer, Berto; Musingwini, Cuthbert; Tholana, Tinashe; Sihesenkosi, Nhleko
    This research study was conducted at the Marikana Operations (Marikana) which are situated within the Western Limb of the Bushveld Complex (BC) located in the North West province of South Africa. The Marikana Operations mine platinum group metals (PGM) using conventional underground mining methods. The Marikana Operations are owned by Sibanye-Stillwater. The PGM conventional underground mining entails extracting a shallow-dipping narrow reef horizon which is accessed via a network of development workings. Within this layout, a travelling way is an inclined tunnel that connects lateral development workings with the workings on the reef horizon. At Marikana the conventional hand-held mining method is used to excavate travelling ways. However, there was a trial process completed that proved the viability of the inverse drop raising method of excavating travelling ways at Marikana. With more than one viable tunnelling method being available for travelling way development, the need arose to select an optimal travelling way development method for Marikana. The selection is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process because it requires the simultaneous consideration of several factors when evaluating the different alternatives or options. Commonly applied tunnelling techniques were reviewed leading to the selection of both the hand-held drill and blasting method and the inverse drop raising method as applicable to the conventional underground mining environment and specifically to travelling way development. Thereafter, Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques were reviewed, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was selected as the MCDA technique to be used as the selection tool for the research, due to its several advantages such as the ability to detect inconsistencies in judgements and provision to remedy the inconsistencies. After the application of AHP, the inverse drop raising method scored 7.2% higher than the hand-held method with a 53.6% versus 46.4% score. The inverse drop raising method was therefore selected as the optimal method to develop travelling ways at Marikana. With the approach that both these methods are currently being executed at Marikana, the inverse drop raising method is nearly twice as expensive as the conventional hand-held method. If PGM prices become a constraint, the method might not be sustainable if executed the way that it is done at the Marikana Operations from a cost perspective. It is suggested that further research should be done to see how the method can be executed more cost-effectively.