Electronic Theses and Dissertations (PhDs)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/10539/37940

Browse

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6

Balancing legality and certainty: the Oudekraal principles and their development
(2020) Mahlangu, Siyabonga
This thesis is a study of the Oudekraal principles and their development. In Oudekraal Estates (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town 2004 (6) SA 222 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal fundamentally transformed the approach of South African law to the anomaly that an unlawful administrative act may have legal consequences. The court rejected past explanations for this phenomenon, such as the presumption of validity, the distinction between voidness and voidability, the theory of legal relativity and, where the courts have declined to set aside unlawful acts on grounds such as delay, judicial pragmatism. Instead, the court developed a principled approach by which it sought to strike a careful balance between the competing rule-of-law values of legality and certainty. Four principles emanating from this seminal judgment are identified in the thesis. These are that an unlawful act may have legal effect for so long as it has not been set aside; that the legal effect depends on whether the validity of an originating act is a precondition for the validity of the subsequent act; that an unlawful act which compels a person to do or not to do something must be valid, and a person affected by it is entitled to challenge its invalidity collaterally; and that the court reviewing an unlawful act has discretion to refuse the remedy of setting aside even if a ground of review has been established. The thesis investigates how the courts since Oudekraal have interpreted, applied and developed these four principles. It concludes that there is an interplay between the various principles. In this interplay the Constitutional Court has recently tended to emphasise the value of legality over that of certainty, resulting in a lack of clarity as to what it means for an unlawful act to have legal effect prior to its being set aside
Enhancing access to justice in Kenya through clinical legal education
(2021) Kotonya, Anne; Du Plessis, Riette
This thesis examines the endeavours of university law clinics towards enhancing access to justice in Kenya. It isolates the social justice function of clinics in countries with a pressing access to justice need as that of serving the indigent and orienting lawyers towards social justice in society. In exploring the interface between access to justice and legal education, it analyses the legal frameworks, distribution, structures, settings and projects of university law clinics in Kenya in relation to literature on clinical legal education (CLE). The thesis centres on the social justice mission of CLE as a way of aligning legal education with the country’s transformative constitutional framework. In this way, it capitalises on the clinics to foster transformative legal education. The thesis makes an original contribution to knowledge when it addresses the research gap on clinical legal education in Kenya and presents empirical data on the current forms of clinical programs in law schools in the country. It incorporates the voices of clinicians and student leaders and presents the challenges they encounter in their attempt to use clinics to enhance access to justice for indigent persons. The emphasis on social justice as well as the comparison with South Africa’s original clinics differentiates this thesis from the growing body of literature that centres on the pedagogical aspects of CLE. The thesis applies grounded theory, a vigorous qualitative research method to guide the collection and analysis of data. The theoretical explanation of the factors that enhance and those that resist the role of clinics in enhancing access to justice is grounded in data which was collected from purposively selected law schools. The data, obtained inductively from the interviews and focus group discussions, is also used to develop a theoretical explanation of the use of university law clinics to enhance access to justice in a transformative constitutional context. The thesis establishes a nexus between legal education and transformative constitutionalism as well as between CLE and transformative legal education. It begins by demonstrating the absence of a suitable framework for investigating the factors that resist or enhance clinics’ contribution to access to justice in a transformative constitutional setting. The thesis then locates clinics in Kenya in the context of the development of the legal profession, legal education and the constitutional history of the country. It develops a legal and institutional framework made up of a transformative constitution and legislation governing legal education, the legal profession and national legal aid schemes. Chapter three proceeds to apply this framework to Kenya and finds a legal framework based on strong constitutional foundations that in certain instances is also fragmented, inconsistent and marred by gaps. The exploration of the CLE experiences in the country is presented in chapter four. These find the curriculum, law students, academic staff and the place of clinic in the university as central to determining the form and structure of CLE in the respective institutions. The forms of clinics are reflective of the broad definitions of CLE that include Street Law and skills courses. They provide evidence of clinics that are skewed towards the social justice mission of CLE. The data also yields aspects of clinics that influence their role in access to justice. The thesis finds that clinical practice in Kenyan universities takes the form of both curriculum-based and extracurricular clinics, with the latter bearing a strong social justice orientation and the former a pedagogical one. The focus of CLE is inclined towards social justice, while its pedagogical mission remains underutilised. The thesis analyses factors that undermine the promotion of access to justice through CLE in Kenya. Identifying shortfalls in clinical practice in the country, it deduces that the clinical practices are indeed CLE but at its nascent stages. The findings are in harmony with literature that considers the twin missions of CLE as inseparable orientations that are not mutually exclusive. They show the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and legal aid legislation as providing further impetus for CLE beyond their original goals at inception. However, this impetus is not reciprocated by the policy and legal framework for legal education. In considering the dysfunction of the legal profession as the dominant institution in providing access to justice, the thesis deliberates on university law clinics as an institutional bypass for the provision of access to justice for the indigent in the country. It proposes university law clinics as the theory of change for the legal profession. The thesis makes suggestions for future research on the understanding that further steps need to be taken in Kenya to optimise both social justice and pedagogy that are the twin missions of clinical practice
Five brigade atrocities in Zimbabwe: categorising international crimes and evaluating the criminal liability of perpetrators
(University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023) Malunga, Siphosami Patrick; Moyo, Khulekani
In virtually every village in the Zimbabwean provinces of Matabeleland and parts of Midlands, there are reminders of heinous atrocities perpetrated against defenceless civilians by the government between 1982 and 1987. These atrocities, commonly known as the ‘Gukurahundi,’ a moniker for the army brigade that committed them, resulted in the deaths of an estimated 20 000 Ndebele civilians. Many of those killed were abducted and forcibly disappeared, and their bodies thrown into mine shafts or buried secretly in shallow graves. Others were publicly executed and buried in mass graves. Thousands more were starved, tortured, raped, unlawfully detained, and their homes and belongings destroyed during the Gukurahundi operation. Survivors continue to bear physical, emotional and psychological scars while alleged high- level perpetrators continue to rely on their political incumbency to enjoy impunity and remain shielded from accountability for their crimes. This doctoral thesis addresses the existing literature gap on the legal classification of the Gukurahundi atrocities. It seeks to determine whether atrocities committed by Five Brigade of the Zimbabwe National Army (ZNA) and other security agencies against civilians constitute international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. It assesses the application of international criminal andhumanitarian law in Zimbabwe and investigates the status of the Matabeleland Conflict under international humanitarian law. Further, it explores whether alleged perpetrators can be held individually criminally responsible for Gukurahundi atrocities under international law. Finally, the thesis is expected to contribute to understanding the legal nature of Gukurahundi atrocities, the role of alleged perpetrators and the victims’ prospects for justice and accountability
Gang violence or the continuation of an armed conflict by other means: the application of international humanitarian and criminal law to gangs as an organized non-state armed group
(University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023-06) Pose, Jorge Claudio Lema; Swart, Mia
The purpose of this thesis is to develop the applicability of International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law to a specific organized criminal group (the maras or gangs in Central America).4 This thesis considers that this criminal actor (the maras) within the gangs presents many similar aspects to traditional non-state organized armed groups. Furthermore, the thesis will explain how the maras have instrumented a level of violence that, in practical terms, has reached the threshold of an armed conflict: in summary, International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law can be applied to the maras
Procedural access to justice: enhancing access to the superior courts of Zimbabwe through reform of selected rules of civil procedure
(University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2023) Matsikidze, Rodgers; Theophilopoulos, Constantine
This thesis argues that the rules of civil procedure can enhance or inhibit access to the courts. Secondly, it argues that there is a nexus between the right of access to the court and the rules of civil procedure, in that rules of civil procedure play a critical role in providing a procedural pathway to court. Thus, in providing a mechanism for realising substantive rights, the rules of procedure become central in ensuring access to court and justice. On the other hand, this thesis argues that the rules of civil procedure governing security costs, leave to appeal and appeals, and referral of constitutional matters (herein referred to as selected rules of procedure) restrict access to court and, in turn, access to justice. This thesis argues that blanket security for costs rules restrict access to the court and can result in litigants being required to tender inhibitive security for costs. The thesis further proposes that the requirement for security for costs must be restricted only to frivolous and vexatious civil claims and appeals. In addition, it is also argued that the strict application of the rules governing appeals in the Superior Courts of Zimbabwe, which result in appeals being struck off the roll for being defective, is undesirable, and there is a need to balance the need for compliance with the rules of procedure and emphasis on unduly technical requirements which do not enhance access to justice. Thus, the thesis argues for the robust application of rules of governing appeals to ensure that appeals are largely dispensed on merits. Further, the thesis argues that the requirement for leave to appeal from the Labour Court to the Supreme Court and from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court is undesirable as it discriminates in favour of direct appeals from the High Court to the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe. Moreso, the requirement for leave to appeal from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court restricts access to justice as it unnecessarily increases litigation costs. It is, therefore, argued that the reform of leave to appeal rules, particularly removing the requirement of leave to appeal from the Labour Court of Zimbabwe to the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe, increases access to justice and affords a litigant an equal opportunity as a litigant appealing from the High Court to the Supreme Court who does not require leave to appeal. In addition, it advocates for automatic appeals to the Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe. Furthermore, this thesis proposes widening the appeal jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court from only being restricted to hearing constitutional matters to also hearing a matter raising an arguable point of law of general public importance. In addition, this thesis argues for more direct access, particularly on constitutional issues, as an avenue to increase access to justice. Additionally, the thesis identifies the rules governing the referral of constitutional issues from the subordinate courts of the Constitutional Court as unduly viii restrictive. There is, therefore, a need to simplify the referral of constitutional matters procedure to increase access to justice by referring constitutional matters to the Constitutional Court. Thus, this thesis focuses on the impact of the selected rules of civil procedure in the Superior Courts of Zimbabwe on court access by litigants, represented or unrepresented. The Superior Courts of Zimbabwe at the centre of this thesis are the High Court, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The thesis concludes that in inhibiting access to the Superior Courts of Zimbabwe, the selected rules of procedure contravene section 69(3) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, which provides for the right of access to the court. It is evident from the comparison made in this thesis that the framing of selected rules of procedure in South Africa and Kenya enhances access to the courts and justice. Thus, the thesis proposes reform of the law and selected rules of procedure to enhance access to the Superior Courts of Zimbabwe. The reform proposal to the selected rules of civil procedure is accompanied by a draft of reformed selected rules of civil procedure and some proposed amendments to enabling Acts of Parliament and the Constitution of Zimbabwe
The use and impact of criminal sanctions for environmental law transgressions in industrial facilities in South Africa: Determining the boundaries of overcriminalization
(2022) Strydom, Melissa
South Africa has many environmental laws that apply to industrial operations, which laws contain numerous criminal offence and penalty provisions. On conviction, criminal liability may be substantial and far-reaching, including maximum prescribed penalties of up to R5 million or R10 million or imprisonment of up to five or ten years, depending on the offence’s nature. The National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 also contains instances where additional criminal liability may be imposed. Writers have described these environmental laws as being ‘littered with new criminal offences’. Criminal law theorists express strong views against overcriminalization, describing it as ‘one of the most serious problems facing criminal law’ because although the criminal sanction should be the state’s ‘ultimate weapon against assaults threatening societal coexistence’, it ‘has become a blunt instrument through its indiscriminate use by legislatures as a tool to ensure obedience’. South African environmental law scholars have considered the criminal sanction in environmental law, but not how the landscape of criminal sanctions has changed over the years, how the criminal sanction is used against industrial facilities that contravene such laws, and what impact this has had on the operation of these facilities or effective enforcement. This research frames these considerations in terms of theories of criminalization and overcriminalization, by establishing a normative framework that can be used to assess what behaviour should be criminalized or what may indicate overcriminalization. This study analyzes changes to four selected South African environmental laws and specific offence categories and considers concluded prosecutions relating to such offences. It reflects the perspectives of 32 participants involved with environmental compliance and enforcement in South Africa, gauging their opinions on themes including criminal law as a last resort, certainty and practicality of the law and its frequent changes, the deterrent effect of criminal sanctions, and challenges in criminal enforcement. These aspects are analyzed within the normative framework to answer the overarching research question- whether the use of criminal sanctions for environmental transgressions in industrial facilities in South Africa has led to overcriminalization and when the use of the criminal sanction is appropriate and effective. The study’s recommendations aim to contribute to the more effective use of criminal sanctions through improved legislative design

Browse

Browsing Electronic Theses and Dissertations (PhDs) by SDG "SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions"

Results Per Page

Sort Options