Browsing by Author "Danielle Giovenco"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Access to Social Protection by People Living with, at Risk of, or Afected by HIV in Eswatini, Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia: Results from Population‑Based HIV Impact Assessments
    (2022-09) David Chipanta; Audrey Pettifor; Jessie Edwards; Danielle Giovenco; Hillary Mariko Topazian; Rachel M. Bray; Monique C. Millington; Janne Estill; Olivia Keiser; Jessica E. Justman
    We aimed to measure social protection coverage among the general population, women and men living with HIV (WLHIV, MLHV), female and male sex workers (FSW, MSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), adolescent girls young women (AGYW), and orphans vulnerable children (OVC) in Eswatini, Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia. We used Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data. We operationalised social protection benefits as external economic support from private and public sources to the household in the last three or 12 months. We estimated survey-weighted proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each population receiving social protection benefits. The sample size ranged from 10,233 adults ages 15-59 years in Eswatini to 29,638 in Tanzania. In the surveyed countries, social protection coverage among the general population was lower than the global average of 45%, ranging from 7.7% (95% CI 6.7%-8.8%) in Zambia to 39.6% (95% CI 36.8%-42.5%) in Eswatini. In Malawi and Zambia, social protection coverage among OVC, AGYW, SW, MSM, and people living with HIV (PLHIV) was similar to the general population. In Eswatini, more AGWY reported receiving social projection benefits than older women and more men not living with HIV reported receiving social protection benefits than MLHIV. In Tanzania, more WLHIV than women not living with HIV, MLHIV than men not living with HIV, and FSW than women who were not sex workers reported receiving social protection benefits. More data on access to social protection benefits by PLHIV or affected by HIV are needed to estimate better their social protection coverage.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Assessing risk for HIV infection among adolescent girls in SouthAfrica: an evaluation of the VOICE risk score (HPTN 068)
    (2019-07) Danielle Giovenco; Audrey Pettifor; Catherine MacPhail; Kathleen Kahn; Ryan Wagner; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Jing Wang; James P Hughes
    AbstractIntroduction:To maximize impact and minimize costs, antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) interventions should beoffered to those at highest risk for HIV infection. The risk score derived from the VOICE trial is one tool currently being uti-lized to determine eligibility in adolescent PrEP trials in sub-Saharan Africa. This study is aimed at evaluating the utility of therisk score in predicting HIV incidence among a cohort of adolescent girls in rural South Africa.Methods:We utilized data from HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 068, a phase III randomized controlled trial con-ducted in rural Mpumalanga province, South Africa. School-attending young women aged 13 to 20 years were enrolled intothe trial from 2011 to 2012 and followed for up to three years. A risk score based on individual-level risk factors measuredat enrolment was calculated for HPTN 068 participants who completed a one-year follow-up visit and were HIV seronegativeat enrolment. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 10. A proportional hazards model was then used to determine if risk score atenrolment was predictive of incident HIV infection at follow-up and an area under the curve analysis was used to examine thepredictive ability of the score.Results and Discussion:The risk score had limited variability in the HPTN 068 sample. Scores≥5 identified 85% of incidentinfections from 94% of the sample, compared to the VOICE sample in which scores≥5 identified 91% of incident infectionsfrom only 64% of participants. The risk score did not predict HIV incidence after one year of follow-up (hazardratio=1.029; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.704, 1.503,p=.884) and showed poor predictive ability (area under thecurve=0.55; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.65). Certain individual risk factors that comprise the risk score may be context specific or notrelevant for adolescent populations. Additional factors should be considered when assessing risk for the purposes of deter-mining PrEP eligibility.Conclusions:The VOICE risk score demonstrated low utility to predict HIV incidence in the HPTN 068 sample. Findings high-light the need for an age and developmentally appropriate tool for assessing risk for HIV infection among adolescents. Use ofthe VOICE risk score for determining PrEP eligibility in younger populations should be carefully considered.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Social isolation and psychological distress among southern U.S. college students in the era of COVID-19
    (2022-12) Danielle Giovenco; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Bryant Hutson; Laurie Buchanan; Edwin B Fisher; Audrey Pettifor
    Background: College students are at heightened risk for negative psychological outcomes due to COVID-19. We examined the prevalence of psychological distress and its association with social isolation among public university students in the southern United States. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was emailed to all University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill students in June 2020 and was open for two weeks. Students self-reported if they were self-isolating none, some, most, or all of the time. Validated screening instruments were used to assess clinically significant symptoms of depression, loneliness, and increased perceived stress. The data was weighted to the complete student population. Results: 7,012 completed surveys were included. Almost two-thirds (64%) of the students reported clinically significant depressive symptoms and 65% were categorized as lonely. An estimated 64% of students reported self-isolating most or all of the time. Compared to those self-isolating none of the time, students self-isolating some of the time were 1.78 (95% CI 1.37, 2.30) times as likely to report clinically significant depressive symptoms, and students self-isolating most or all of the time were 2.12 (95% CI 1.64, 2.74) and 2.27 (95% CI 1.75, 2.94) times as likely to report clinically significant depressive symptoms, respectively. Similar associations between self-isolation and loneliness and perceived stress were observed. Conclusions: The prevalence of adverse mental health indicators among this sample of university students in June 2020 was exceptionally high. University responses to the COVID-19 pandemic should prioritize student mental health and prepare a range of support services to mitigate mental health consequences as the pandemic continues to evolve.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Effect of PrEP Use Disclosure on Adherence in a Cohort of Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa
    (2022-04) Danielle Giovenco; Audrey Pettifor; Kimberly A Powers; Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Brian W Pence; Jessie K Edwards; Katherine Gill; Jennifer F Morton; Ariane van der Straten; Connie Celum; Linda-Gail Bekker
    Effective strategies to support PrEP adherence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are needed. We examined PrEP use disclosure and its effect on adherence among 200 AGYW ages 16-25 initiating PrEP in South Africa to help inform these strategies. We estimated the relative prevalence of high adherence (intracellular tenofovir-diphosphate concentration ≥ 700 fmol/punch) 3- and 6-months after PrEP initiation among those who disclosed vs. did not disclose their PrEP use, both overall and by age. Most AGYW disclosed to a parent (58%), partner (58%), or friend (81%) by month 6. We did not observe a strong effect of disclosure on adherence overall; however, among younger AGYW (≤ 18 years), those who disclosed to a parent were 6.8 times as likely to have high adherence at month 6 than those who did not (95% CI 1.02, 45.56). More work is needed to understand parents' roles as allies and identify ways peers and partners can motivate PrEP use for AGYW.