Decentralisation and recentralisation in South Africa's local government: case studies of two municipalities in Limpopo
dc.article.end-page | 35 | |
dc.article.start-page | 12 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chilenga-Butao, Thokozani | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-16T21:27:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-16T21:27:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.department | Department of Political Studies | |
dc.description.abstract | Democratic decentralisation was introduced in South Africa during the transition to democracy (1990-1994). It followed a long trajectory of centralisation and decentralisation processes that took place during apartheid. This paper argues that in order to more adequately understand the prospects for decentralisation to achieve its intended outcomes in South African local government, one has to understand some of the complexities and political dynamics present in this sphere of government. In so doing, it shows that the intended outcomes of decentralisation are far from the realities of local government on the ground, specifically municipalities. Case studies of two Limpopo mining town municipalities, Lephalale and Mogalakwena, are used to demonstrate some of these complexities and political dynamics. The Mogalakwena case study will show that, despite the codification of recentralisation in the South African constitution, regional and political party elites misuse the policy to politically interfere in municipalities. The effects of this are that service delivery slows down and local government is subjected to localised national and provincial political battles. The Lephalale case study shows how the layers of decentralisation between apartheid and democracy have led to this municipality being dependent on private and parastatal mining companies for the provision of and access to public goods and services. | |
dc.description.librarian | MM2024 | |
dc.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chilenga-Butao, T. (2020). Decentralisation and recentralisation in South Africa's local government: case studies of two municipalities in Limpopo. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 103, 12-35. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2020.0011. | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2020.0011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | Online ISSN 1726-1368 | |
dc.identifier.issn | Print ISSN 0258-7696 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10539/38498 | |
dc.journal.title | Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, Volume 103 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Published by Transformation | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Volume 103 | |
dc.school | School of Social Sciences | |
dc.subject | Democratic decentralisation | |
dc.subject | South African local government | |
dc.subject | Limpopo mining town municipalities | |
dc.subject | Lephalale | |
dc.subject | Mogalakwena | |
dc.subject | Administrative decentralisation | |
dc.subject | Fiscal decentralisation | |
dc.subject | Political decentralisation | |
dc.subject | Constitution of the Republic of South Africa | |
dc.subject | Municipal Structures Act, 1998 | |
dc.subject | Intergovernmental Relations Framework Act, 2005 | |
dc.title | Decentralisation and recentralisation in South Africa's local government: case studies of two municipalities in Limpopo | |
dc.type | Article |