Intraoperative neuromonitoring ethics and governance
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Nel, Jacques David
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This research report sets out to evaluate the ethics and governance in the field of
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in South Africa. The purpose of this
research report will be to identify the ethical and legal dilemmas that are present
when performing IONM without being registered with the Health Professions
Council of South Africa (HPCSA). The focus will be on the ethical controversies
that arise when performing IONM without registration. Ethical principles such as
respect for persons, autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice will be
used to defend my position. There will also be a legal component which will focus
on the issues of IONM in the courtroom within South Africa. National and
international guidelines and recommendations will be used to defend the regulatory
aspect of the argument.In South Africa IONM is practised with a lack of regulatory and ethical policies in
place. Performing and interpreting IONM constitutes a medical procedure and so a
person wishing to perform IONM must have a particular set of medical skills under
the constructs of healthcare. This not only ensures that the person understands and
acknowledges ethics and health law within IONM but also allows the person to be
regulated by a governing body, the HPCSA. The HPCSA serves as a body to
regulate healthcare professionals and allows patients to lay complaints against
healthcare professionals if there has been forms of negligence. There is, however,
little mention of unregulated persons performing IONM without registration with
the HPCSA. Registration with the HPCSA ensures that persons performing IONM understand
the function of a healthcare professional while performing IONM. Being registered
with the HPCSA also enforces legal responsibility to the person performing IONM.
There are currently no guidelines as to the ethical and legal responsibilities of both
the surgeon and the person performing the IONM. Furthermore, there is also nodocumented standard of skill that must be expressed by the person performing the
IONM. This reveals several ethical and legal dilemmas, for example undermining
autonomy and respect for persons and the possibility of harm and diminished
benefit.
Description
A research report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Medicine (Bioethics and Health Law) to the Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2020