Illegitimate voices, peripheral debates, valid alternatives: A developing world articulation of alternative food networks

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAbrahams, Caryn
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-10T09:43:07Z
dc.date.available2008-03-10T09:43:07Z
dc.date.issued2008-03-10T09:43:07Z
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT The theoretical argument that emerges from my empirical study argues that food provisioning systems in Johannesburg, as a potential lens to further investigation of food supply systems in the developing south cannot be classified within a traditional-modern dichotomy. This dissertation proposes a new conceptual device – a food provisioning continuum – which should inform research on African food supply systems in the future. The process of locating this rich case within a broader theoretical paradigm to validate it and to provide it discursive space, however, is not objective or without friction. I argue that it is possible to choose to locate rich empirical material in different conceptual frameworks, related not only to its applicability, but also to how the research may be valued and seen to extend knowledge. The expectation of the research community and the epistemological demand of new research, for a Masters dissertation is that the scholarly work will build on and extend existing knowledge. It is assumed that thorough research will challenge the boundaries of knowledge and that the candidate, after having undergone this academic rite of passage, will graduate from being a student to being a colleague within a research community. However, the process of creating new theory and advancing existing theory is not quite an objective or frictionless process as it first appears. Research in the south is validated more highly if it is located within, or builds upon international/northern theory even by research forums in the south like the NRF. The pressure for researchers from the south to locate their research in conceptual frameworks from the north – in order to be validated – appears to be one of the rules of the game. While this is validation as part of an academic exercise may be necessary, the practise entrenches spatial or geographical hierarchies within academia and academic discourse. The epistemological process of forging new theoretical frontiers is thus a constructed, unnatural space fraught with less critical valuing systems than are expected to be present within academia, no less within the discipline of geography.en
dc.format.extent30143446 bytes
dc.format.extent59454 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/4616
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAfrican food supply systemsen
dc.subjectconceptual frameworken
dc.subjectacademic spacesen
dc.subjectwriting a dissertationen
dc.titleIllegitimate voices, peripheral debates, valid alternatives: A developing world articulation of alternative food networksen
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Abrahams MA ABSTRACT.pdf
Size:
58.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Abrahams MA 2006.pdf
Size:
28.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
96 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
ETD Collection