An exploration of teachers' views and experiences towards the use of Gauteng primary literacy & mathematics strategy (GPLMS) lesson plans with and without coaches: a case study of six teachers in two Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) schools

dc.contributor.authorMolotsi, Gontse
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T09:09:24Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T09:09:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-09
dc.descriptionA research report submitted to the Wits School of Education, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education by combination of coursework and research Johannesburg; 2015en_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this qualitative research report was to explore teacher’s views as perceptions regarding one of South Africa’s Literacy and Numeracy intervention strategy. The specific area in this regard, was to explore the two major tools that are gaining popularity within teacher development studies. These tools namely the usage of scripted lesson plans and coaches were also used in this intervention strategy to develop teachers in the selected underperforming schools throughout Gauteng Province. This research aimed to find out from six participants in two different schools how they perceived using these scripted lesson plans and having coaches in their classrooms who helped them interpret and use the lesson plans they were provided with. The research evaluates the knowledge the participants gained from this experience and once the coaches no longer visited their classrooms and schools, the teacher’s experience of using the scripted lesson plans without the coaches’ supervision. The participants in this report expressed how they appreciated the coach-mediated lesson plans provided for them in the Gauteng Primary Literacy and Mathematics Strategy program. However the participants stated problems with the pacing of the lesson plans where some teachers felt that the lesson plan pacing was too fast for their learners and how some of the activities did not fit the context of their schools. The participants stated that they had a problem with the structure of the content in the lesson plans and the fact they taught too many different concepts in one week. This they stated was confusing for the learners and themselves. With regards to the coaches mediating the lesson plans, the participants showed a sense of appreciation at having someone who would help them unpack the lesson plans, but expressed the need for the coaches to model the teaching pedagogues, which was ultimately never done, rather than just talking them through them. The attitude or interpersonal skills displayed by the coach became one of the big issues that either influenced the reception or rejection of the coaches’ presence in classrooms. The one thing all participants’ concurred on was the supply of other resources such as posters and flashcards, which they stated they found very useful as a stimulus for the learners.en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/20051
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.subjectGauteng Primary and Literacy Intervention Strategy
dc.subjectScripted lesson plans
dc.subjectCoaching
dc.subjectTeacher development
dc.titleAn exploration of teachers' views and experiences towards the use of Gauteng primary literacy & mathematics strategy (GPLMS) lesson plans with and without coaches: a case study of six teachers in two Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) schoolsen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Gontse research report final 5 November 2015.docx-word document.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections