Evaluating implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for preconception and pregnancy within the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa

dc.article.end-page12
dc.article.start-page1
dc.contributor.authorSoepnel, Larske M.
dc.contributor.authorDraper, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorMabetha, Khuthala
dc.contributor.authorMogashoa, Lethabo
dc.contributor.authorMabena, Gugulethu
dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
dc.contributor.authorKilleen, Sarah Louise
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Chandni Maria
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Shane A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T07:23:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentPaediatrics
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in a low/middle-income South African setting. Methods: This is a mixed-methods study. Following administration of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist by a dietitian between July 2021 and May 2022, quantitative responses from pregnant (n = 96) and nonpregnant (n = 291) participants with overweight or obesity were analyzed, using logistic regression. Qualitative data from in-depth interviews with the dietitian and a subgroup of participants (n = 15) were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Of 387 participants, 97.4% (n = 377) answered ‘no’ to at least one diet quality question on the FIGO Nutrition Checklist, indicative of an at-risk dietary practice. Food insecurity was positively associated with having more than three at-risk practices (OR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.10–3.18; P = 0.021). Themes from the dietitian interview included ease of use of the checklist; required adaptations to it, including explanation and translation; and benefits of the tool. Despite challenges to healthy nutrition, participant interviews identified that the checklist is acceptable and supported improved awareness of dietary intakes. Conclusion: Considering the high incidence of at-risk dietary practices identified by the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in this population, further research into use of the tool across South African healthcare settings is warranted.
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth African Medical Research Council
dc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research
dc.description.sponsorshipSANLiC
dc.description.submitterPM2026
dc.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
dc.identifier0000-0002-2885-437X
dc.identifier0000-0002-2022-0268
dc.identifier0000-0001-7124-3788
dc.identifier.citationSoepnel LM, Draper CE, Mabetha K, et al. Evaluating implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for preconception and pregnancy within the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2023;160(Suppl. 1):68-79. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14541
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1879-3479 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1002/ijgo.14541
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/48565
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
dc.schoolSchool of Clinical Medicine
dc.subjectAcceptability
dc.subjectFIGO Nutrition Checklist
dc.subjectMixed methods
dc.subjectNutrition
dc.subjectObesity
dc.subjectPreconception
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectScreening tool
dc.subject.otherSDG-3: Good health and well-being
dc.titleEvaluating implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist for preconception and pregnancy within the Bukhali trial in Soweto, South Africa
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Soepnel_Evaluating_2023.pdf
Size:
4.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: