Adverse reactions to pharmacological agents used in stress myocardial perfusion imaging studies: differences in older and younger patients in a South African population cohort
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Momodu, Jaleelat Imoitseme
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a non-invasive nuclear medicine technique that plays
a valuable role in the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients who are
unable to tolerate exercise, pharmacological stress MPI with coronary vasodilators is widely
used as an alternative to achieve coronary hyperemia.
This study aimed to assess age-related differences in patient tolerance to coronary
vasodilators (adenosine and dipyridamole), as well as compare their side effect profiles in a
South African population cohort. In addition, other factors that may influence tolerability to
coronary vasodilators were identified.
Two hundred and sixty-four patients undergoing pharmacological stress MPI between
August 2018 and November 2019 were prospectively observed for the development of
adverse effects during or immediately after the intravenous vasodilator infusion. One
hundred and forty seven patients (55.7%) received adenosine while 117 patients (44.3%)
received dipyridamole. An age threshold of 60 years was used to divide the study population
into two groups; <60 years (Group A) and > 60 years (Group B). Adverse effects occurred in 62.1% of the study population, majority of which were mild and
moderate adverse effects and required no intervention. Only 3 patients (1%) developed
severe adverse effects which required reversal with intravenous aminophylline. Older study
participants (Group B) were 42% less likely to develop adverse effects compared to younger
study participants (Group A) (OR = 0.58; 95% CI= 0.35-0.97; p=0.036). For adenosine, chest
pain and dyspnea were the most common adverse effects in Group A and B, respectively.
For dipyridamole, headache was the most common adverse effect in both age groups.
Adenosine was three times as likely to cause adverse effects compared to dipyridamole (OR
= 3.23; 95% CI= 1.93-5.43) (p<0.001). However, dipyridamole showed a higher propensity
to cause higher grade adverse effects despite more participants receiving adenosine
(p<0.001). Pharmacological stress MPI with intravenous vasodilators is an overall safe method for
assessing CAD. Side effects are more common in younger patients but are largely tolerable
and resolve spontaneously after termination of the vasodilator infusion.
Description
A research report submitted n fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree of
Master of Medicine
in the branch of Nuclear Medicine to the Faculty of Health Sciences,
University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2020