Managing cooperatives for sustainability in the Community Work Programme (CWP)
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015
Authors
Dichabe, Barileng Bathakgile
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to uncover reasons why poverty
alleviation initiatives have not yet yielded satisfactory sustainable
development in the country. The non-sustainability of cooperatives has
been a challenge within poverty alleviations programmes. Government
has initiated various poverty alleviation programmes in an effort to fight
poverty, however, some of these projects emanating from these poverty
alleviation initiatives have not been sustainable and end up collapsing, this
has affected the lives of people who have become solely reliant on them
as a means of income generation.
This matter has also been outlined in the Fifteen Year Review Report of
Income Poverty Alleviation Programmes in Social and Related Sectors in
2008, stating that early weaknesses in M&E, the inability to demonstrate
“community driving” and cost inefficiency are partly to blame for the failure
of poverty alleviation programmes.
In 2004, the then President, Thabo Mbeki, outlined three pillars as a
Government strategy to fight under development and poverty in the
country (www.psc.gov.za, Report on an audit of Government’s Poverty
Reduction Programmes and Projects:2007:10-16). Those pillars were:
· Enlarge growth and development in the first economy
· Increase the possibility to create jobs and address
challenges of the second economy
· Build a social security net to bring about poverty alleviation.
The above report further indicates various programmes earmarked to fight
poverty such as the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP);
Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme (ISRDP); Urban
v | P a g e
Renewal Programme (URP); Local Economic Development (LED);
Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) etc. This indicates concerted efforts
by Government to fight poverty and underdevelopment which is necessary
to bring about sustainable development.
The results of the study clearly indicate gaps in intergovernmental support
to the community work programme. The cooperatives linked with the
programme clearly require a multi-departmental support such as funding,
training, monitoring, support from the Department of Cooperative
Governance; Seedlings and skills from Department of Agriculture; Land to
plough or use for recycling from the Municipality/tribal authority/
Department of Land Affairs; Access to market their produce/wares from
the Department of Trade and Industry/ Tshwane Municipality etc. There
should be legislation mandating all relevant departments to consolidate
efforts to provide support and guidance to specific cooperatives.
Description
Thesis (M.M.)--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Graduate School of Public and Development Management, 2015