Washington versus Beijing consensus: Is the Beijing consensus a suitable model for attaining Angola's development objectives

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMazibuko, Jefrey
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-25T11:44:58Z
dc.date.available2014-07-25T11:44:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-25
dc.description.abstractThe period after the end of the Cold War the early 1990s, when number of academics would continuously label the United States of America (USA), France and the United Kingdom (UK) as the only external supremacies to have extensive interests in Sub-Saharan African countries such as Angola with the use of the Washington Consensus, has contemporary been threatened by the new African economic dependency on China through the Beijing consensus (Frieden, 2000, 14). Over the course of the past ten years or so, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has established itself as a progressively prevailing player across Sub-Saharan Africa. Academics have consequently argued that China in Africa has been a theme widely discussed lately and one of the questions that centre’s around this discussion; is the Beijing Consensus a suitable model for achieving Angola’s development objectives as compared to earlier Western attempts through Washington Consensus?en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/15019
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.titleWashington versus Beijing consensus: Is the Beijing consensus a suitable model for attaining Angola's development objectivesen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ABSTRACT.pdf
Size:
143.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Jefrey's Masters Dissertation.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
ETD Collection