Disputed interpretations and active strategies of resistatnce during an audit regulatory debate

Simple item page
dc.article.end-page648en
dc.article.start-page620en
dc.citation.doi10.1108/AAAJ-2020-5049en
dc.contributor.authorMichael Harberen
dc.contributor.authorG Verhoefen
dc.contributor.authorC de Villiersen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-23T05:58:19Z
dc.date.available2024-07-23T05:58:19Z
dc.facultyFACULTY OF COMMERCE, LAW & MANAGEMENTen
dc.identifier.citationWOSen
dc.identifier.issn0951-3574en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/39370
dc.journal.titleDisputed interpretations and active strategies of resistatnce during an audit regulatory debateen
dc.journal.volume36en
dc.titleDisputed interpretations and active strategies of resistatnce during an audit regulatory debateen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Journal Article.pdf
Size:
866.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Bitstream uploaded by REST Client
Download
Collections
Academic Wits Research Outputs (All submissions)