An investigation into the use of shredded rubber as aggregate in concrete

dc.contributor.authorVarghese Kochuvadakkel, Jeen
dc.contributor.otherKochuvadakkel, Jeen Varghese
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T12:34:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-10T12:34:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionA research report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering, 2020en_ZA
dc.description.abstractNumerous studies are available on incorporating waste tyre rubber for aggregates in concrete, for use in the construction industry. However, limited information is available on the extent to which higher percentage of rubber, replacing aggregates can be introduced so as to use them in non-structural works. This study focuses on analyzing the compressive strength and durability properties of the concrete, when fine aggregates are replaced at 7.5, 15, 25, 35 and 50% by volume with shredded tyre rubbers. The characteristics of rubberized concrete to changes in water-to-binder ratios (0.40 and 0.55) and binder types 70/30 Portland Cement (PC)/fly ash (FA) and 50/50 PC/ground-granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) are studied by varying one parameter at a time. Concrete cubes were cast and compressive strength tests conducted at 7, 28 and 56 days, and durability index tests at 28 and 56 days. The results indicated significant reduction in compressive strength of mix concrete with increase in percentage of rubber content replacing fine aggregate by volume. The addition of fly ash binder in rubberized concrete have beneficial effects on compressive strength compared to GGBS binder. The compressive strength of rubberized concretes was greatly influenced by a change in water binder ratio. At lower water binder ratio of 0.40, irrespective of binder type, the concrete specimens containing up to 50% replacement of fine aggregates with rubber particles, attained the acceptance criteria of at least 2 MPa above minimum characteristic strength required for plain and reinforced non-structural concrete works. At higher water binder ratio of 0.55, the acceptance strength requirement for non-structural plain concrete works was attained with the maximum of 50% in FA concrete, and with concrete containing only up to 35% rubber particles in GGBS concrete. However, for reinforced non-structural works, acceptance requirement was attained with only up to 25% fine aggregate replaced with rubber content in GGBS concrete and with 35% rubber content in FA concrete with prolonged curing. For the parameters tested, the OPI of FA binder rubberized concrete exhibited higher values compared to rubberized concrete with GGBS binder, indicating better permeability, thereby concrete quality. GGBS rubberized concrete exhibited better water sorptivity and chloride conductivity indices compared to FA concrete. The extent to which change in water binder ratio and binder type affects the durability properties of rubberized concrete, varies depending on the percentage of rubber particles incorporated in the mix design. Increasing percentage of rubber particles decreased the sorptivity indices indicating better quality of concrete. Furthermore, increase in rubber content in concrete proved to be detrimental to concrete durability with respect to chloride conductivity, which improved with prolonged curing. Irrespective of the variations with water binder ratio and binder type, rubberized concrete exhibited good durability properties with respect to oxygen permeability, water sorptivity and chloride conductivityen_ZA
dc.description.librarianCK2021en_ZA
dc.facultyFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environmenten_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/31191
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_ZA
dc.titleAn investigation into the use of shredded rubber as aggregate in concreteen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
THESIS REPORT.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Cover and abstract.pdf
Size:
50.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections