Performance optimisation of a compression ignition engine fuelled on Ethanol
| dc.contributor.author | Teise, Heinrich Richardt | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2006-11-14T07:57:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2006-11-14T07:57:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006-11-14T07:57:53Z | |
| dc.description | Student Number : 9506932W - MSc research report - School of Mechanical Engineering - Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment | en |
| dc.description.abstract | In this research project, the performance and emissions of a conventional compression ignition engine fuelled on ethanol as main fuel and dimethyl ether as ignition promoter were investigated. Tests were first conducted on diesel fuel, then on ethanol fuel with dimethyl ether and compared. All tests for both fuelling techniques were conducted at the same engine speed and injector pressure. However, engine settings with specific reference to injection timing and injector pressure were optimised to suit diesel fuel, and were left unaltered when the engine was fuelled on ethanol and dimethyl ether. The injector nozzle configuration used for diesel fuel was a standard three-hole type nozzle, whereas for ethanol fuel with dimethyl ether a standard three-hole nozzle as well as a four-hole type nozzle was used. Also investigated was the effect a catalytic converter would have on exhaust emissions, from both fuelling techniques. The performance results of ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel compared favourably to that of diesel fuel. The brake power attained for both fuelling techniques was approximately the same, however the only penalty incurred to this desired result was the simultaneous increase in the brake specific fuel consumption of ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel. The fuel conversion efficiency of ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel was also found to be lower than that of diesel fuel, this largely attributed to the difference in energy release patterns between the two fuels. The emissions results obtained showed that ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel burns cleaner, mainly due to its chemical structure containing oxygen molecules. The NOx, THC, CO and CO2 emissions, produced before the catalytic converter, of ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel were lower than those of diesel fuel. The catalytic converter further produced lower emissions, with the four-hole type nozzle producing the most desired results. In terms of catalytic converter efficiency, THC and CO emissions were more readily removed compared to NOx. In addition, virtually no smoke emissions were detected for ethanol/dimethyl ether fuel combustion. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 4459174 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10539/1660 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | ethanol | en |
| dc.subject | dimethyl ether | en |
| dc.subject | DME | en |
| dc.subject | catalytic converter | en |
| dc.subject | performance | en |
| dc.subject | emmisions | en |
| dc.subject | catalytic converter efficiency | en |
| dc.title | Performance optimisation of a compression ignition engine fuelled on Ethanol | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |