Evaluation of the quality of public participation in the environmental impact assessment reports (EIARs) of renewable energy projects in the Northern Cape province of South Africa
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Ntsulumbana, Nyameko
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Public participation is mandatory according to the South African National Environmental Management
Act (NEMA Act No. 107 of 1998) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations
promulgated in 2014, and as a result the quality of public participation has to be in line with regulatory
requirements. The current study evaluated the quality of public participation in the environmental
impact assessment reports (EIARs) of renewable energy projects in the Northern Cape province of
South Africa. The South African adapted version of the Lee and Colley Review Package methodology
was utilised to carry out the assessment on 22 sampled EIARs, in line with the 2014 regulations.
Two out of 22 (9.1%) EIARs were allocated the quality grading of “B”, while 18 (81.8%) EIARs received
“C” quality level, and the remaining 2 (9.1%) EIARs were assigned a “D” quality score. Detailed
reports, particularly on areas involving public participation process reports, were classified as strong
as they adequately addressed and were compliant with different clauses of the 2014 NEMA EIA
Regulations. On the other hand, poor quality reports were as a result of inadequate information
provided regarding the public participation process leading to their weaknesses. The weaknesses
were partly due to lack of clarity regarding EIARs on obtaining written permission by landowners of
anticipated projects, before environmental authorisation was granted. Also, the weaknesses
regarding the reports were due to lack of alternative methods to accommodate stakeholders who
cannot understand English and/or Afrikaans. The EIARs which could not furnish any relevant details
on the stipulated dimensions of the notice-boards, also led to reports classified as weak due to their
poor completion.
Taking into consideration the quality trends emanating from the current study, several
recommendations are proposed to enhance the writing of EIARs pertaining to public participation in
order to contribute to improved planning and better decision-making regarding environmental matters.
Description
A research report submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science to the Faculty of Science, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2021