Evidence for a bi(multi)lingual advantage on working memory performance in South African university students

dc.contributor.authorWigdorowitz, Mandy
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-26T12:36:31Z
dc.date.available2016-07-26T12:36:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A (Social and Psychological Research))--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Humanities, School of Human & Community Development, 2016en_ZA
dc.description.abstractDue to linguistic diversity within South Africa, multilingualism is becoming increasingly prominent. Since South Africa is host to 11 official languages, it is the norm rather than the exception that South Africans are exposed to more than one language. This has social, educational and cognitive implications. Specifically, research indicates that the acquisition of additional languages to an individual’s mother tongue has a positive effect on working memory – the short-term storage and manipulation of information during the performance of cognitive tasks – which may confer a ‘bi(multi)lingual advantage’ and could improve academic performance. Consequently, the aim of this study was to determine whether working memory ability differs significantly between students who are monolingual or multilingual, while statistically controlling for intellectual ability and socio-economic status between these groups. Participants were 78 undergraduate students, comprising English first- (monolingual, Mage = 20.06 years, SD = .88) and second- or additional-language (multilingual, Mage = 20.03 years, SD = 1.03) speakers, matched for age, gender and socio-economic status. Language groups were compared on the Automated Working Memory Assessment (Alloway, 2007) and subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition (Wechsler, 1997). One-way between-group ANCOVAs showed that (a) the multilingual group outperformed the monolingual group across five of six non-verbal subtests, namely Mazes Memory and Block Recall (non-verbal simple span), and Odd One Out, Mister X and Spatial Recall (non-verbal complex span), (b) the multilingual group outperformed the monolingual group on two verbal subtests, namely Digit Recall (verbal simple span) and Listening Recall (verbal complex span), (c) the language groups performed equivalently on verbal simple and complex tasks of Word Recall, Non-word Recall, Counting Recall and Backwards Digit Recall. The findings contribute to the extant literature confirming a ‘bi(multi)lingual advantage’ in executive functioning. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of academic performance. Keywords: working memory, monolingualism, multilingualism, bi(multi)lingual advantage, South Africaen_ZA
dc.format.extentOnline resource (xii, 127 leaves)
dc.identifier.citationWigdorowitz, Mandy (2016) Evidence for a bi(multi)lingual advantage on working memory performance in South African university students, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, <http://hdl.handle.net/10539/20717>
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/20717
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.subject.lcshMultilingualism--Psychological aspects
dc.subject.lcshMultilingual persons--Psychology
dc.subject.lcshShort-term memory
dc.subject.lcshAcademic achievement--South Africa
dc.subject.lcshCollege students--South Africa
dc.titleEvidence for a bi(multi)lingual advantage on working memory performance in South African university studentsen_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mandy Wigdorowitz - Abstract.pdf
Size:
153.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Mandy Wigdorowitz - Final Master's Report (2016).pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections