Illegible data: A counterpoint to the evidence-based approach in policy decision making

Simple item page
dc.article.end-page27
dc.article.start-page1
dc.contributor.authorAbrahams, Caryn
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T13:11:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T13:11:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.departmentSouth African Institute of International Affairs
dc.description.abstractThe art of governing is closely linked to the statecraft of decision making based on evidence. Population dynamics, social change and the growth of the middle class are some of the data analyses used to shape and influence policy directions and programmatic interventions in particular places. Data analysis is a crucial technology of governance, and it is how place, people and neighbourhoods are known and made legible to the state where the typical goal of the state is the reduction of the ‘disorderly, constantly changing social reality beneath it to something more closely resembling the administrative grid of its observations’ (Scott, 1998:82). Moreover, this ordering tendency is necessary for decision making that will have the highest impact for the greatest number of people – so there is, indeed, a crucial logic to this approach. Drawing from feminist urban scholars and others, this paper offers a provocation of sorts. It discusses the implications of the homogenising tendency at the heart of data-led approaches to governing. It considers the categories of urban residents and urban life that evade simplification and thus escape meaningful inclusion in policy intervention. This paper does not provoke a discussion of the ‘residual/elided/invisible/foreclosed’, that is, the illegible, unreadable and unseen in an attempt to diminish the potential and power of data-driven approaches to governance. Rather, it offers a counterpoint, and argues for the other kinds of illegible/unseen/residual data to sit alongside the data considered more legible and credible for decision-making processes. The goal of doing this is so that our knowing, official interests and rational models of policy intervention do not become mechanised or automated, but retain a view on the textual, nuanced and unresolved matters that make up everyday life in everyday contexts.
dc.description.librarianMM2024
dc.description.sponsorshipHanns Seidel Stiftung
dc.facultyFaculty of Commerce, Law and Management
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37708
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTayarisha Working Paper Series | Number 2023/016
dc.rights©2023 Tayarisha African Centre of Excellence in Digital Governance
dc.schoolWits School of Governance
dc.subjectAfrican Governance
dc.subjectDigital Age
dc.subjectIllegible data
dc.subjectHomogenising tendency
dc.subjectData-driven approaches to governance
dc.subjectArt of governing
dc.subject.otherSDG-9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.titleIllegible data: A counterpoint to the evidence-based approach in policy decision making
dc.typeWorking Paper
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Illegible data A counterpoint to the evidence-based approach in policy decision making.pdf
Size:
420.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Wits School of Governance - African Governance in the Digital Age (Working papers)