Forensic mental observations - a comparative analysis of outcome and psychiatric morbidity
Date
2014-04-25
Authors
Schutte, Tiaan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to compare the outcome and psychiatric morbidity of the forensic mental
observation referrals, in the two legally created groups of awaiting trial detainees – the ‘singles’
representing the minor violent and non-violent offenders versus the ‘panels’, representing the
seriously violent offenders.
Method
A cross-sectional, retrospective record review of 200 cases, spanning from January 2010 to August
2010, of all individuals admitted to the Forensic unit of Sterkfontein Hospital, for 30 days psychiatric
observation.
The Pearson’s Chi squared test for categorical data was used to determine statistical significance.
Results
Of 110 ‘singles’ 49 (44.55%) were found fit for trial and 40 (40.4%) criminally responsible, whereas of
the 90 ‘panel’ cases 60 (66.67%) were fit for trial and 57 (64.77%) were criminally responsible. (p =
0.002 and 0.001 respectively)
Conclusion
Those charged with seriously violent offences appear to be more likely to be found both fit and
responsible, compared to those charged with less serious offences.