Is Kripke right about statements of identity between names?
dc.contributor.author | Harris, Chadwin Mark | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-13T11:25:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-03-13T11:25:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-03-13T11:25:51Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract In this report I critically evaluate Kripke’s rejection of the possibility of contingently true statements of identity between names. I extract his argument for this view from his book Naming and Necessity and his article “Identity and Necessity”. I discuss debates in the relevant literature about Kripke’s positions on naming, reference and modality, as these issues influence Kripke’s conclusions about statements of identity between names. I provide my own arguments for rejecting Kripke’s conclusions and accepting that there can be contingently true statements of identity between names. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10539/6732 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Kripke | en |
dc.subject | Identity | en |
dc.subject | Naming | en |
dc.subject | Rigid designation | en |
dc.title | Is Kripke right about statements of identity between names? | en |
dc.type | Thesis | en |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 96 B
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: