Comparison of three anaesthetic scavenging devices using cuffed and non-cuffed nasal endotracheal tubes during dental anaesthesia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMoyes, D.
dc.contributor.authorCleaton-Jones, P.
dc.contributor.authorShaw, R.
dc.contributor.authoret al
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-29T10:19:38Z
dc.date.available2016-04-29T10:19:38Z
dc.date.issued1981
dc.descriptionKIMen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMoyes,D., Cleaton-Jones,P., Shaw,R., et al. 1981.Comparison of three anaesthetic scavenging devices using cuffed and non-cuffed nasal endotracheal tubes during dental anaesthesia. South African medical journal;59(6):180-182en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/20276
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Dentalen_ZA
dc.subjectIntubation, Intratrachealen_ZA
dc.subjectNitrous Oxideen_ZA
dc.subjectAir Pollution/prevention & controlen_ZA
dc.titleComparison of three anaesthetic scavenging devices using cuffed and non-cuffed nasal endotracheal tubes during dental anaesthesiaen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison to three anaesthetic scavenging devices using cuffed and non-cuffed nasal endotracheal tubes during dental anaesthesia.pdf
Size:
293.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Outputs (Oral Health Sciences)