Variables determining response to intensive intervention in pre-school language impaired children.
Date
2008-09-05T09:51:18Z
Authors
Mulligan, Jennifer
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This was a comparative longitudinal study of the files of 50 children who attended intensive
language therapy at The Centre for Language and Hearing Impaired Children over the past 8
years. The research compared initial and final assessment results to determine what specific
language areas improve when children attend an intensive therapeutic pre-school
environment. A paired comparison t-test with a 95% (alpha = 0.05) level of confidence was
used to determine whether the difference between the initial and final assessments was
statistically significant. The study also examined and described associated child and family
specific variables such as: previous assessments and therapy, gender, pregnancy and birth,
birth order, feeding, developmental milestones, medical history, ear infections, family history
of disorders, behavioural and emotional issues, medication, play, fine and gross motor
development, parental education level and referral to primary school. The sample of children
was then grouped into severity and types of language impairment: moderate receptive and
expressive language impairment, severe receptive and expressive language impairment, and
moderate expressive language impairment. These groups were analysed and described in
terms of associated variables, degree of improvement made in receptive and expressive
language ability, as well as variables which may influence progress including number of
associated variables, age of admission and length of time attending The Centre for Language
and Hearing Impaired Children. The findings of this study were statistically significant for
intensive intervention in receptive grammatical morphology, receptive syntax, expressive
vocabulary in the initial stages of intervention, and expressive syntax, indicating that
intensive structured language intervention was effective for this population of language
impaired children. Receptive vocabulary was the only language area in the study that did not
improve, and this finding highlights the importance of assessment and direct intervention for
receptive abstract vocabulary. Certain associated variables manifested more frequently than
others in the case history profiles of this population of language impaired children, specifically
behavioural problems, medical issues, a family history of related difficulties, and delay in first
word and first sentence production. Overall, the number of associated factors in this study
had a cumulative effect in determining severity of the impairment, but did not appear to
negatively impact progress in intervention. In many of the language areas where catch-up
improvement occurred, a high number of associated factors was found. Age at admission and
amount of time spent at The Centre for Language and Hearing Impaired Children appeared to
be important factors in determining catch-up improvement in the various language areas of
this population, particularly the severely impaired children. The limitations of this study and
related thoughts for future research are discussed.