How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChien, MM
dc.contributor.authorSetzer, S.
dc.contributor.authorCleaton-Jones, P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-29T09:03:27Z
dc.date.available2016-04-29T09:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.descriptionKIMen_ZA
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the clinical and radiographic responses after 3 months to a sterile compression technique with zinc oxide-eugenol or 15.5% ferric sulphate in 145 pulpotomised primary teeth in 30 children. In both groups of teeth the success rate was 100%. These short-term results suggest that either technique may be used.en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationChien,M.M., Setzer,S., Cleaton-Jones,P. 2001. How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material? Journal of the South African dental association;56(3):130-135en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/20274
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.subjectZinc Oxide-Eugenol Cementen_ZA
dc.subjectPulpotomyen_ZA
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cappingen_ZA
dc.titleHow does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material.pdf
Size:
351.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Outputs (Oral Health Sciences)