Utilising the Software Engineering Methods and Theory framework to critically evaluate software engineering practice in the South African banking industry
Date
2016-03-17
Authors
Le Roux, Alistair Graham
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In recent years, software has become the cornerstone of banking and new business products are
directly dependant on software. The delivery cycles for new features is now related to market share.
This drive to use software as a vehicle for competitive advantage has created an environment in
which software development of new business systems are increasingly on the critical path of many
projects. An organisation’s portfolio of software intensive projects is situated within this complexity
and organisations attempt to mitigate the risks associated with these complexities by implementing
software development processes and practices. A key problem facing the modern bank is how to
define and build a software development process that caters for both the traditional and
increasingly agile genres of software development characteristics in a consistent and manageable
way.
The banks attempt to address this problem through continuous methodology and process
improvements. Comparing and assessing non-standardised software engineering lifecycle models
without a common framework is a complex and subjective task. A standardised language is
important for simplifying the task for developing new methods and practices or for analysing and
documenting existing practices.
The Software Engineering Methods and Theory (SEMAT) initiative has developed a standardised
kernel of essential concepts, together with a language that describes the essence of software
engineering. This kernel, called the Essence, has recently become an Object Management Group
(OMG) standard. The Essence kernel, together with its language, can be used as the underpinning
theory to analyse an existing method and help provide insights that can drive method
enhancements.
The research report proposes a simple, actionable analysis framework to assist organisations to
assess, review and develop their software engineering methods. The core concepts of the
methodology are identified and mapped to the Essence concepts. The governance model of the
Essence is mapped to the governance model of the industry model and a set of practices is identified
and documented in the Essence language. The mapping and resulting analysis can be used to test
the validity of the Essence theory in practice and identify areas for improvement in both the method
and the Essence standard.
The analysis framework has been applied to an operational software development lifecycle of a large
South African bank. A mapping of the Essence concepts to the governance model and method
documented in the lifecycle was completed. This mapping revealed that the Essence is a valid tool
and can be used to describe a method in practice. Furthermore it is useful as an analysis framework
to assess the governance model that manages and measures the progress of an endeavour in the
Bank.
The case study and resulting analysis demonstrate that the Essence standard can be used to analyse
a methodology and identify areas for improvement. The analysis also identified areas for
improvement in the Essence specification.
Description
A research report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and The Built Environment of the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering
September 2015