3. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) - All submissions
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/45
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Bank loans, bonds, and information monopolies across the business cycle: test of the South African market(2013-06-04) Nkambule, Mbongiseni ThokozaniCorporate finance theory suggests that bank’s private information about borrowers lets them hold up borrowers for higher interest rates and that hold up power should increase with borrower risk, and if so, banks with private information about borrowers should increase their rates in recessions more than warranted by borrower risk alone. Studies have been concluded in other markets for these propositions, particularly for the US market. This paper has replicated these studies for an emerging economy (Republic of South Africa) to see if the findings will hold across dissimilar markets. Hold up cost is not just a function of information monopoly, Rajan, 1992 posits that firms with a higher probability of failure should suffer more from informational hold-up cost. The risk of failure is more pronounced during recession than in expansion and hence relationship banks with information monopolies are able to extract more rents in recession than warranted by borrower default risk alone. Using literature that suggest that information rents can be mitigated by multiple banking relationships, I investigated further, whether this problem of hold up cost can be mitigated through a different channel by studying credit spreads of firms that have publicly sourced funds, and continued to seek private funds in the South African market.Using LOANSPREAD as the dependent variable in a regression model, I find that loan spreads are higher for bank-dependent firms, rise in recessions and rise by a greater amount in recessions for bankdependent firms. In the context of this study I define bank-dependent firms as those firms who have issued no public bond. The key finding is that, indeed multiple banking relationships can reduce informational monopolies, but issuing public bonds can be another channel that South African firms can use to avoid being taken advantage of by financiers with information monopoly over competing financiers.Item Deficient due diligence?(2013-03-18) Patel, Adnan InayatThe effectiveness of traditional due diligence practices and whether they contribute to Merger and Acquisition (M&A) success or failure is an ongoing debate in finance research. This research report contributes to the debate by examining the effectiveness of traditional due diligence using a qualitative research approach. A dataset of traditional due diligence practices was compiled from the literature, which formed the basis for an interview which was conducted with corporate finance practices. The findings indicate that the traditional due diligence process is considered to be an evolving process, where due diligence practices of the last decade are considered to be significantly different from the due diligence required in acquisitions today. Due diligence is also considered to be indispensable, and its scope and importance underestimated. Furthermore, any perceived deficiency in a due diligence is not necessarily in concept, but rather in execution, with excessive focus on the accounting and legal aspects of a M&A, while neglecting the macro-environment, marketing, production, management and information systems. It is also concluded that most stakeholders have understood that failure to carry out proper due diligence could be financially damaging to the parties transacting. In an attempt to determine what due diligence means for the current as well as the future, this study uncovers a critical trend in the forms and manner of flawed due diligence practices and paves the way to a more strategic due diligence, which are useful for practitioners in the present and in the future for M&A success.